[ad_1]
Former Secretary of State for the Environment, Carlos Pimenta, on Friday denied the existence of excessive revenue from wind energy since calls for electricity were made by the government. Offers were legal, transparent and "aligned" on compensation in the European Union
For Carlos Pimenta, there is no surplus revenue in wind farms. There have been competitions and when there are competitions, there is no lace by definition. In Portugal, he defends, there were gains for the state, for the autarchies and a new industry was created that she called "Autoeuropa do vento", with lower rates than those attributed to other countries. "Where are the excessive revenues?"
The former PSD politician, who is also involved as an entrepreneur and manager of several wind power projects in Portugal, is heard Friday in the parliamentary commission to investigate excessive energy revenues Questioned by Emídio Guerreiro of the PSD on the concentration in time of the policies of support to the producers of energy financed by the prices of the electricity, Carlos Pimenta estimates " that today it would have been possible to do better. "
2007 – everything happens at the same time, the final approval of the CMEC regime (costs of maintaining the contractual balance) and the call for bids for the award wind energy.
Although he admits that it would have been possible to do better, the former leader, who is heard as a specialist, comments that "everyone is hitting Totobola on Monday, but he does not." When we judge a policy, we must place ourselves in the historical context of the decision maker.In response to Socialist MP Luis Testa, Carlos Pimenta argues that Portugal has done better than Spain whose 39, wind industry is here and challenges members of the commission revenues to spend a day with it,
Since his initial intervention, Carlos Pimenta has raised questions about the defense of wind energy against attacks from those who point out the extra cost paid to these producers as the heaviest income in the final price of electricity
Whereas the account for the cost of wind energy must include the impact environmental alternatives to pr fossil energy production, Pimenta says that a coal-fired power plant like Sines only turns into energy one-third of the fuel that it burns. The rest is in the center and "serves to warm the water for surfers (beach of S. Torpes)". For the former governor, the Portuguese governments have been able to register technological improvements because protected tariffs for initial wind energy contracts are declining and those awarded for the 2006 tender offer are lower than French and German tariffs.
It also highlights the creation of a new industry with 4,000 jobs and exports, reducing CO2 emissions and fuel imports. What if we did not make the wind? Alternatives were natural gas or nuclear. Natural gas, although more efficient than coal, also produces emissions and depends on gas imports and is vulnerable to price fluctuations. Carlos Pimenta says that at current prices, from 70 to 75 euros per megawatt hour, most of the wind is already competitive
. What about nuclear? "It 's not an option for Portugal, it' s a shame – there 's something I' ve done that I 've been proud of, I' d like. have been involved in the decision not to make nuclear. "Despite the fact that the nuclear option is a legitimate discussion, Carlos Pimenta mainly highlights the financial risk of this investment for a country like Portugal. And it recalls the history of the new generation reactor commissioned by Finland for 3.500 million euros and is expected to be ready in 2009.
We are in 2018 and this factory does not work not. Siemens left the consortium and abandoned the nuclear and the French continued and the account is already at 11 billion euros. The French state has forced EDF to build a new plant and the cost is already 12 billion. Imagine the financial risk. This is to put the eggs in the same basket. And if the factory stops?
Carlos Pimenta also recalled the problem of waste that has not been solved and recalled a European Convention limiting the payment of damages in the event of a nuclear accident.
If there is an accident in Spain, compensation The maximum amount paid by the operator is 700 million and the state pays 800 million euros. The losses of Fukoshima are already more than nine billion. Nuclear power is a zero option for Portugal. "
Carlos Pimenta was also confronted with expressions heard in the inquiry commission of personalities who criticized support for renewable energies, such as the" electric monster "- denounced by Mira Amaral – and the" explosive cocktail " By Pedro Clemente Nunes. " [196459003] Still on the economic problem of wind energy and the weight they have." Carlos Pimenta points out that wind farms awarded in 2006 already have lower rates than combined cycle power plants (natural gas). And the highest rates, awarded in 2002, will end in two years. He also points out that in the next decade, machines will be recycled to equipment with higher capacity and a market regime.
The wind resource will be much more used without even increasing the power. The choice was good. "And leave the note." In the medium term, at five, the fruits we sow will be harvested and Portugal will have competitive prices at the European level. "
According to the former leader, wind farms are even gaining in comparison with PPPs and CMECs, and when they do not produce, they do not earn, unlike plants that are protected from all market risks, and warn of the negative impact of the market. instability on the policy of support for renewable energy, especially on small producers.
People have no idea of the effect that the proposal (of the Left Bloc) to create a contribution of 250 million on renewable energy had in November of 2017.
Carlos Pimenta also admits the scenario of the review that should support renewable energy subsidies, currently are fully supported by domestic consumers, but warns that e the shift from cost to business will have an impact on the competitiveness of the economy. Among the costs of the general economic interest, which represent 40% of the bill paid by families, the previous government admits that "who should pay was the taxpayer and not the consumer, but who pays is the same even if the distribution key "
Recalling also the most expensive VAT paid in Portugal on electricity, Carlos Pimenta also asked about the perception of the audiovisual contribution in the electricity bill, in accordance with the French law. argument also used by the former Minister Manuel Pinho
I am a defender of television and public radio, but it was not more logical to get 200 million euros per year for TV Cabo's clients. "
Carlos Pimenta was Secretary of State for the Environment between 1983 and 1984, in the well-known central block government, headed by Mário Soares, then, between 1985 and 1987, in the X g constitutional government headed by Cavaco Silva. Carlos Pimenta heads the venture capital fund NovEnergia, owner of several renewable energy projects
Source link
