[ad_1]
Cases reported by the magazine that generate an insurgency among the population, who say that there are first homes that are not completed and that others that were born where there would be ruins, will already be finished.
In particular will be the cases in which the owners will have asked to change the tax address in Finance, by passing a non-permanent residence to their first residence. Houses that, according to the Vision, would have been uninhabited for many years, would not be the permanent residences of the owners, or would not even be habitable. In Vision The President of the Regional Coordination and Development Commission of the Center, Ana Abrunhosa, admits that she can not guarantee that there was no such thing of interventions in cases that did not correspond to permanent housing or tax residence, other documents
could testify of the state of housing would be the consumer records
water or light. even at a house that did not even burn.
"We have tried to articulate the information, but I can not guarantee that for other reasons, even a house that has not been burned does not come into existence. was not supported, "he said.
Ana Abrunhosa recalls that the Revita bylaw did not initiate the original version because she did not expressly mention that the tax addresses submitted were to relate to the day of the fire.
Ana Abrunhosa assures that the CCDR has said "no" to a lot of process, quite to validate and prove all the processes that have happened to it, said that it "has no reason to be wary of "processes learned by the local authorities, remembering nonetheless the social institutions that work in the field because the CCDR does not have the power or authority to require accountability . "The core partners were the municipalities and we have no reason to be suspicious," he said.
Questioned by Vision about the possibility of a falsified application of data, Ana Abrunhosa guarantees that if you have data to corroborate this suspicion, she will be "the first to report the situation".
The magazine's report was published on Thursday. Listened to by Antena 1, Ana Abrunhosa guarantees that these suspicions will be sent to the public prosecutor.
The President of the CCDR reiterated that there was no facilitation in the analysis of processes and that the entity was rigorous.
At Antena 1, the head of the parish council of Vila Facaia in Pedrógão Grande confirms that there are houses that are illegally recovered.
Mayor Jose Henriques confirms that he knows several situations of houses that were not inhabited and that are now being recovered with donations money and that the Council has already received several complaints.
The Vision received no response from the Pedrógão Grande City Council, the councilor who followed the instructions of the procedure, nor from the coordinator of the GORR, Operational Bureau for Reconstruction and Reconstruction
. Vision . The Ministry of Planning and Infrastructures stressed that it is incumbent on the CCDR to coordinate all operations, but that responsibility for reconstruction rests with several entities. The office of Pedro Marques also left the guarantee that "no irregularity has been reported so far"
Source link
