[ad_1]
"There are many contradictions that indicate that the Shroud is not authentic, that it is an artistic or didactic representation," says one of the investigators.
The study, published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, was conducted by Matteo Borrini, of Liverpool John Moores University, and Luigi Garlaschelli, of the Committee on Control of Statements on Pseudoscience (CIPAF ), were published yesterday by the Italian newspaper La Stampa
Luigi Garlaschelli gave his own "manifesto body" for to experience in which the true and artificial blood was used, wrapped in a similar tissue at the Shroud.
Using the same methodology for criminal scenarios, investigators determined that many bloodstains on the Shroud are not compatible with those left by a crucified body. 19659002] "We have simulated the crucifixion with crosses of different shapes, different types of wood with different body positions: horizontal arms, vertical, on the head," they report. They concluded that many of the plaques could only be made by a standing, uncoated body.
This survey only examined the blood flow of an injury, did not analyze the substance spread on the tissue that created the spots.
"The Shroud and the mythology that surrounds it
"
"They seem to have been created artificially, with a finger or a brush", say the researchers
Source link