[ad_1]
It was in April 2014. During a public action, four students from the University of Minho climbed a wall that was on the public road, a masonry structure with a shutter in concrete, similar to a bus stop and used to house the mailboxes of a neighboring building.
When the case went to trial, the Crown asked for conditional sentences, alleging that the students had acted carelessly because it was visible to all the degradation of the wall.
The Crown appealed the decision alleging that the investigation into the causes of the fall of the wall had not been conducted until the end.
19659002] The judges of Relação de Guimarães concluded that it was necessary to go further in determining the facts, which could designate other people responsible for the accident , namely the municipality and the co-ownership.
Civil Engineering. But the LNEC says that at this point you can not extract anything from the wreckage of the wall that is in the courtyard of City Hall. In addition, neither the design nor the details of the construction or maintenance of the structure are known.
An expert report would only be possible on the site and after the accident. The ECL concludes that it is not in a position to pronounce what appears to render unlawful the repetition of the judgment ordered by the Court of Guimarães Relation
Source link
