Revealed: CCGs Where Cancer Guidance Is Slowest | New



[ad_1]

Six percent of respondents to the latest national survey of the cancer patient experience said they had seen their GP five or more times before being told that they had to go to the hospital – but in Brent, northwestern London, this figure was 11%.

The second highest proportion of patients reporting that it had taken five or more visits to be hospitalized was in the Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group, South London, with 9.8%.

The 2018 data is based on the responses of 73,817 cancer patients to the care given, 43% nationally claiming to have seen their GP once about health problems caused by cancer before being admitted to hospital .

Nationally, 11% of patients consulted their GP three or four times before being referred.

However, Herefordshire CCG practices in the West Midlands recorded a performance of 16.2% on this measure, the highest in the country.

Three GCCs from northwestern London, including Brent, scored 13.4% or higher for this measure.

A spokeswoman for the Herefordshire CGC said nearly half of the respondents had been referred after a single visit to their GP.

However, she said in a statement, "We are working with our primary care colleagues to ensure referrals in a timely manner. Work is underway in Herefordshire and Worcestershire. [Sustainability and Transformation Partnership] improve education and training in primary care, especially with regard to identifying signs and symptoms of cancer suspicion and improving access to primary care testing. "

Collaboration between North West London CCGs stated that "the patient pathways were unique because there were many combinations of tumor sites and cancer stages at the time of diagnosis" and that it would therefore make no difference. commentary on individual circumstances.

A spokeswoman said: "As a local NHS region, we have good results in cancer. we achieved the highest one – year survival rate nationally and the fourth highest five – year survival rate at the national level. Our emergency reporting rates, where patients are diagnosed in A & E, are the second lowest in the country.

"We consistently reach the goal of treatment in less than 62 days and our partners in the Royal Marsden Partners Cancer Alliance are the only alliance to meet the 85% standard for 62-day goals."

Fall behind

News published in the Lancet revealed that Britain's cancer survival rates continued to lag behind other rich countries.

The research compared results from 1995 to 2014 in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Norway and Ireland. He noted that although the results have improved considerably, Britain "has not yet caught up with other countries".

NHS England said that the study of the International Partnership for Comparative Cancer Analysis, led by Cancer Research UK, was "obsolete", the end of the five-year study period.

A spokeswoman said that the data from the Office for National Statistics showed an increase in one-year survival from 71.5% to 72.8% from 2014 to 2016. The most recent data from Public Health England on Cancer Survival concern 2014.

NHSE said in a statement: "The NHS long-term plan will build on this progress by stepping up action to detect more cancers as early as possible, when the chances of survival are higher, saving tens of thousands of lives each year. "

But Cancer Research UK said it probably would not happen if diagnostic shortages were not resolved.

[ad_2]

Source link