Florin Talpan reacts after the announcement of a big victory by Becali

Steaua defense sports club lawyer Florin Talpan reacted after Gigi Becali said he had won a big victory and would soon regain the "Steaua" mark.

The Bucharest Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed the FCSB's request for the cancellation of Steaua's trademark, which belongs to CSA Steaua, but Gigi Becali nevertheless claimed to have won the case because some small n & rsquo; Had not yet been judged.

Following Becali's statements, Florin Talpan submitted a point of view at the request of Ziare.com.

This is what Zarea.com said about Talpan:

"THE STEAUA / STEAUA BUCURESTI BRAND WE HAVE STAYED AT THE NEW HOME OF THE STEAUA CLUB! The judges of the Court of Appeal have decided today, when, on the portal, you will enjoy with us:The action for annulment of the bad faith of the national mark STEAUA BUCURESTI nr. 72827, the identical trade mark application and the cancellation of the national mark STEAUA BUCURESTI nr. 130,904."

Among many other motions, the lawyers of the FCSB have asked the Bucharest Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal to annul the Steaua / Steaua Bucharest marks, due to existence of bad faith in the filing of the application for registration and the reason that the marks of Steaua Bucuresti Club had been registered. the infringement of the FCSB applicant's prior rights resulting from a well-known mark not registered under the name STEAUA and, respectively, of a STEAUA sign used in its commercial activity during the period 2003-2015, both acquired prior to the filing date of the applications for registration of these later marks.

As I quoted above in the decision of the Court of Appeal, The request of the FCSB's lawyers was rejected.

As well, the request for FCSB's lawyers was rejected because the court of appeal sent to the ICCJ its request for a decision of the Supreme Court to rule on certain articles of Law 84/1998which, in the opinion of their lawyers, would be illegal and unconstitutional. Quote as much on the portal: Rejects the request for inadmissibility of the ICCJ.

It is true that the call was admitted in part. But as long as Steaua stays at home at Steaua Army Sports Club, it does not matter.

It is true that the process is not finished, only a match was played and I think we won.

This admission relates to the fact that, while dismissing the action of the FCSB in annulling the Steaua / mark of decadence, etc., he felt that there should exist a number of queries among which we quote : "Resolution of Exceptions of Material Incompetence and Inadmissibility and Referral to the Constitutional Court".

The FCSB also solicited the reputation of a Steaua brand that did not belong to it and would not belong to it. In fact, evading the law in one way or another and bypassing a definitive and irrevocable sentence pronounced by the ICCJ is an economic third.

But he did not succeed today, the judges rejecting the cancellation of the mark Steaua belonging to the club Steaua Bucharest and his forfeiture for bad faith.

We will continue to judge on January 22, 2019, and I hope you will be with me, your lawyer, who, under tremendous pressure from the media, the club, and the ministry, can resist appearing and continue to win our brand.

We are happy that the Star / Star Bucharest brand stays at home, but I still do not like it. As I said once and always, we laugh and we look good! "

to follow Newspapers.com and Facebook! Comment and see in your new Facebook news feed the latest and most interesting articles from Ziare.com.