[ad_1]
The idea now is that people from the country would have been humiliated and left in the rain and cold outside the BOR during the sanctification service of the cathedral. Does this new anti-church attack have a foundation?
– objectively speaking, can not accommodate 50,000 people in a space designed for 5,000 peoplemuch less in the circumstances of an event requiring a protocol standard. Or maybe the progressives want to say that the cathedral is too small? Could he have housed 50,000 people in a small wooden church, as they had asked two years ago?
– The fact that there were security measures and that official guests of the service of sanctification were invited by the cathedral was due to the presence of personalities such as the Ecumenical Patriarch – head of state.
– There was no "humiliation of the nation" – these measures are necessary throughout the civilized world during an event of such a level. If you think that these measures are exaggerated, go to Israel in any way, involving ministers or public figures – and you will see the security there.
– The access restriction was lifted after 3 pm on Sunday.. The access of all the "humble drunks in the street" and all participants was allowed in the cathedral and in the altar after 3 am, all day long.
– The cathedral is open non-stop to pilgrims until the last pilgrim, every day until Thursday at 15:00. No one is in a hurry, you can worship quietly and admire the altar. The last pilgrim entered Sunday afternoon in the sanctuary at 1 o'clock.
– Babies were not "trampled" – There were small bumps, inevitable at such an event. People stayed in the cold for hours and stood up voluntarily; some were impatient, others were stuck. But there were isolated incidents, they were not representative of the atmosphere and the spirit of the event.
– As for the cold, whoever has already come knows that the inside is at least as cold as outside. The guests have no advantage, on the contrary.
– These luxury machines are shielded protocol machines provided by SPP for official events. – They belong to SPP. No, the patriarch did not come down from a golden limousine; it's an ordinary thing.
– Luxurious vestments do not reflect the contempt of "baptized popes" against the "humiliated" – they are specific to orthodoxy. And that reflects, if you will, the glory of the Emperor of Christ – the priests and hierarchs are the image of the ministry of Christ in his church (I do not discuss their merits here, it's the only way to do it). is a separate question).
– BOR could not make transparent fencesto see through them also those of the street. For the simple fact that the high and concrete fences of the cathedral are, in fact, those of the House of the people. The court is located in the house of the people.
– Yes, there are some who have criticized the CA, including "that he has not made transparent fences". All of these things are heard by friends or gathered around. And it seems to me I fell in a real delirium. Maybe instead of digging, it's worth the effort and going so far, to understand at least geographically what's going on with the cathedral – if we're still so concerned about the subject ?
And the humble dumbbells "humbled" and "trampled" stand in the days following sanctification for 5 to 6 hours in the queue to enter the altar, willingly or forcibly. In an equally voluntary and involuntary way, there are young and old, rich and poor. But it is precisely because I am willing and unwilling to be the same "jornalist" I now claim to complain of mercy will come back soon call them "fools", "the middle ages" and "bones bulls".
– Comment by Cătălin Gabriel Sturza –
THE COMMENT IS ASSUMED BY THE AUTHOR
Source link
