[ad_1]
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the complaint filed by former Ploieşti DNA official, Lucian Onea, against the judicial review imposed by prosecutors in the case in which he is accused of complicity with the author and abusive research, according to agerpres.ro.
"The complaint lodged by the applicant Lucian Gabriel Onea against Decree 21 / P / 2018 of 22 November of 22 November of the Office of the Prosecutor at the High Court of Cassation and Justice – Criminal Investigations and Investigations Section is dismissed." said the minute of Wednesday's decision.
On November 22, the Attorney General's Office ordered the extension of the preventive measure of judicial review over a period of 60 days, from November 24, 2018 to January 22, 2019, to Lucian Onea and former prosecutor Mircea Negulescu.
Both are under judicial supervision in July, with the prohibition to communicate with each other and with certain persons, to practice the profession of prosecutor and to hold weapons.
VIDEO Premier IMAGINI with Viorica Dăncilă in Alba Iulia – WHICH OBJECTIVE visited the Prime Minister
Lucian Onea is the subject of criminal prosecution for abusive involvement in complicity in favor of the perpetrator, unfair repression and abusive searches, and Mircea Negulescu is accused of undue involvement in the form of complicity favoring the perpetrator. author and complicity of unjust repression.
The attorney general's office argues that in 2015, Lucian Onea and Mircea Negulescu forced former MP Vlad Cosma, threatening him directly to incriminate his sister, Andreea Cosma, so that he would not be able to do so. she falsely complains. other names and lists / lists of voters in the Republic of Moldova, documents showing that voters would have received money as an "electoral bribe". The documents were sent by fax and mail from Chisinau to DNA Ploiesti.
The prosecutor's office also states that, although he knew that the evidence had been misdirected by Vlad Cosma, Lucian Onea asked the Prahova court to arrest an accused for the bribery offense of voters, presenting the evidence to the court.
Source link