lack of Hagi players to Plimob Sighet forwards



[ad_1]

The top juniors, coached by Daniel Oprescu, were crushed by Ireland 5-0, while Daniel Mogosanu's shot was marked by a 5-1 win of the similar formation in Austria.

Gazeta Sporturilor yesterday titled "6 matches in the capital" for young people under 17 years. However, there were only two, as both teams are unlikely to make the last tournaments after a catastrophic start. Both scored 5 goals and only the youngest scored one in overtime, an Austrian autogol. What are the reasons for the fall of the first stage of the groups?

1. BOW BETS

For example, during the last elite tour, Romania U19 missed the last leg of the final tournament in Finland. A goal marked by Ukraine has left Boingiu boys home, one of which, Screciu, is part of the lot today.

However, the gap between generations is sensitive. The most visible is in attack. In 2018, the summits were Drăguş, Sîntean and Robert Moldoveanu. The first made his debut in the big national team, the second is at U21, the third plays the title in L2. now the summits come from Plimob Sighet, a team from L4, and Lipova Sole (L3). There are 4 in the "county" of Maramures, under the bears Bârsana or Zorile Moses!

2. WITHOUT HAGI AND FCSB

At U19, the number of footballers raised at the Hagi Academy is significantly lower than normal. This is because the generations were weaker at the Academy, especially in the under 19s. For example, Dan Oprescu had at his disposal only one player of the Future, Leca, nor the one used as a title nor presented as one of the 5 reserves!

Beyond that, although four of them are from the Academy, it is worth mentioning that only three of them were basic people, one being replaced by Ovidiu Perianu (FCSB), injured. Who was the only footballer in Bucharest?

3. DISCRIMINATION AGAINST UNDESIRABLE

Romania entered as an outsider in both groups of elite tours. And at U17 and U19. We started with the fourth chance and saw the difference in value.
For example, Ireland has one of the best generations of recent times. Midfielder Conor Coventry was part of the West Ham team and even played in an 8-0 League Cup game with Macclesfield. Otherwise, players from Bayern Munich, Manchester United, Liverpool, Southampton or Celtic.

4. STROKE

for example at U19, there were only 3 pairs of footballers from the same team. Otherwise, people from Snagov, Popeşti-Leordeni, Mioveni, Baia Mare, Sighet, Lipova, Media, a combination that did not succeed. The only two teams were Phare (Ehmann and Toma), Craiova (Baicu and Mihaila) and CFR (Ispas and Petrila).

5. HISTORY

Finally, we must understand the proportions: Romania under 17 and Romania under 19 participated in only 2 of the 34 tournaments organized since 2003. In fact, 32 qualifications were missed! The only generation that managed to get a euro without hosting under 17 is Brănescu, Steliano Filip, Himcinschi, in 2011. M19, the same year, with captain Nicuşor Stanciu, failed the tournament held in Ilfov.

Romania U17 – Austria U17 1-5

They scored: Koller (90 + 2 – autogol) / Nelson (16), Pehlivan (22, 39), Bockle (73, 90)
Romania: Sava – Chilili, Drăguşin, Vita, Stefanovici – Crivac (73 I. Borcea), Grameni (73 Szondi) – I. Stoica, Silver (70 Corbeanu), Pitu – L. Munteanu. Selection: Daniel Mogosanu

In the other match, Italy U17 – Turkey U17 2-0.

ranking:

1. Austria 3p (5-1)
2. Italy 3p (2-0)
3. Turkey 0p (0-2)
4. ROMANIA 0p (1-5)
Qualifies first and best of the 7 places out of 8.

Romania U19 – Ireland U19 0-5

They scored: Afolabi (9, 64), Smallbone (11, 53), Ehmann (57 – autogol)
Romania: L. Cristian – A. Rus (32 Isla), Ehmann, Screciu, S. Banerban (58 Ispas) – Manolache (33), R. Chiriac – R. Baicu (79), Mihăilă, Petrila – Mitruscsak). Selectionist: Daniel Oprescu

In the other match, Russia U19 – Azerbaijan U19 0-0

Ranking:

1. Ireland 3p
2. Azerbaijan 1p
3. Russia 1p
4. ROMANIA 0p
Only qualifies first place

[ad_2]
Source link