[ad_1]
In a new testimony released Monday by Democrats in the House of Representatives' oversight committee, a White House security official told Congress that a number of White House officials had been prevented from obtaining security clearances because of red flags on their record, but that "dozens" of security denials. were rejected by President Donald Trump.
"Once we decide, the president has absolutely the right to override and grant permission," said Tricia Newbold, who is currently reviewing security clearances at the Trump White House, "but this does not mean that we should change the way we do business. "
Newbold told investigators that she was made public because she feared that the security clearance process had become politicized inside the Trump White House.
"I want him to know that it is a systematic problem, that it is an office, and that we are not a political bureau, but that these decisions were constantly canceled, "Newbold told the media, in the framework of the Monitoring Committee.
The publication of Newbold's information and testimonials angered Republicans within the monitoring committee, which denounced the publication of the information in their own publication, calling them "reckless use of information about launchers". # 39; alert. "
Democrats said Newbold's testimony had shown that "many security clearance denials were systematically canceled without following proper protocols as to why senior officials did not agree with the evaluations and without commemorating the risks that they accepted ".
The document released by the Democrats examined the case of three "White House senior officials," detailing a series of disqualifying factors, including foreign influence, personal behavior, and external employment.
<! –
->
Newbold, who is currently working at the White House, told investigators at an interview last weekend that she had taken her concerns repeatedly in the chain of command because she had stated that 39, there was an unusually high number of provisional security checks granted under Trump. Administration.
In the liberation of the Democrats, Newbold claimed that she had been the subject of a "series of retaliatory and harassing actions" for raising questions about security checks and had been suspended without pay for 30 days on January 30, 2019.
"The specific reason for her suspension was an allegation that she failed to follow a new policy created by Mr. Kline in November 2018, of scanning documents into separate .pdf files instead of a .pdf file. unique when sent to other agencies "declared Democratic Liberation.
Support true journalism Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today.
See offers.
Your subscription to Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and surveys that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.
[ad_2]
Source link