[ad_1]
Disney certainly has a way of doing too much. The more money is thrown into a film, the more the scenario is lost. The higher the number of movies added to a franchise, the less the plot becomes credible. With Disney's latest blockbuster, "Nutcracker and the Four Kingdoms" (released Friday, November 2), the media giant still manages to take an old and beloved story and inflate it in the name of winning the 39; money. But hey, it's Hollywood.
In this adaptation of The Nutcracker, Clara (Mackenzie Foy) is a young girl gifted for inventiveness and love of the laws of physics. As the first Christmas approaches since the death of her mother, Clara and her family struggle to cope with the holidays and face each other, each addressing her grief in different ways. Before her death, Clara's mother left each of the children's gifts open for Christmas Eve. Clara's mother left her brothers and sisters with significant gifts with practical uses; for Clara, she left a complex egg, missing the key to unlock what it contains.
Feeling flouted, Clara takes it from her father (Matthew MacFadyen) just before the annual Christmas Eve party at his godfather's place, Drosselmeyer. It turns out that Drosselmeyer's Christmas present to Clara is the very key she needs to open her mother's gift. The gifts she and her siblings received were hidden in her godfather's mansion, and as Clara followed her way, she was taken to a secluded room. The mysterious corridor is transformed into a winter wonderland of snow and woodland, which is strongly reminiscent of "The Chronicles of Narnia". The key she needs to free her mother's gift is in sight, but she will be seized by a mouse just before Clara puts her hands. . While she follows the mouse further into the forest, Clara learns more about this strange world, as her mother played a role in the creation.
It's clear to see where Disney was heading with that – a family vacation movie that will appeal to the whole family. After all, the best children's movies engage children and entertain parents (think "Coco" or "Zootopia"). At the author's merit, the script contains some interesting twists and creative scenes. Unfortunately, the rest of the film strives to be original and loses the magic of "The Nutcracker" that we all know and love.
With a large production budget, a handful of major players and resources available to Disney, the movie had almost everything it needed to succeed. A crucial missing aspect was a convincing scenario. Individually, each of the actors has talent, although when combined, they do not have a scenario powerful enough to play the talents of each.
"The Nutcracker" ends with a set of actors who try to overcompensate for the absence of a strong script with an exaggerated game. Foy is supposed to give life to a strong and intelligent character, but his fits of headache arouse more than tantrums. Keira Knightley absolutely destroys the fairy Sugar Plum, giving her character a voice worse than nails on a blackboard. MacFadyen's lines describe his character more as a crying adult than as a grieving widower. Even seasoned actors Helen Mirren and Morgan Freeman can not save the day with the few lines given to them.
What is missing in the story and the storyline, "The Nutcracker" is offset by the design of sets and costumes. The superb attention to detail is a nice distraction from what's happening in the movie. The incredible cabinets and hair of the 18th century, the intricate houses and palaces and the credible special effects are so eye-catching, and add the extra layer of magic that makes Disney famous.
Disney may have been able to catch the attention of its target audience for a few hours and maybe teach us a lesson or two along the way. But the fact is that the studio has not managed to make a good movie. "Nutcracker and the Four Kingdoms" is a story that Disney should have left alone and you should save to be seen as a ballet.
I give "Nutcracker and the Four Kingdoms" two and a half stars out of five.
[ad_2]
Source link
