[ad_1]
I am someone who ardently defends artistic freedom. Sometimes you have a vision in your head and you just have to give it a physical shape. Essentially, it is the artist's look on the subject that serves as inspiration. And sometimes, these shots can be a bit difficult for the general public to digest. And recently, an industry that has pushed the boundaries of this love-hate relationship is the fashion industry.
To be more precise, with denim. We have witnessed strange details of ripped jeans, extremely cut jeans and what else. Add to that the exorbitant prices they boast about and it's practically an attack on humanity.
Now, joining the league of the strange denim stockings that no one has asked, it is the jeans in reverse.
Is it just me, or is looking at this pair of jeans trying to make sense of it, give you a headache? I mean, what's going on here?
The original idea of the brand Cie Denim, a pair of inverted high-waisted jeans called Will, is selling for nearly $ 34,000. The description of the company reads as follows:
"The Will is our original high-waisted inverted jeans." Belt loops that wrap around the ankle, back pockets on the calf and belt made of the original hem of the ankle.Each pair is built in New York's selected vintage denim, which makes each pair unique. "
Can any one m? explain what is the purpose of the belt buckles? Good, that's "ART".
Denim Co. even has an option of reverse jeans shorts for its customers who would like to feel some breeze on their legs.
This particular style calls Nancy and sells for a little less than her long-legged cousin. As little as ₹ 26000 to be exact. Oh yes, that's it.
What's going on with our clothes now? The faithful jeans. The wardrobe staple. Why do we need to bother with something that is already perfect? Still, I remember the words of the best Disney princess so far, Shuri: "Just because something works, does not mean that it can be improved." Okay, Shuri. I will take your word for it. But do these new "styles" count as an improvement? What do you think?
[ad_2]
Source link
