[ad_1]
A border patrol officer from the United States addresses immigrants after their arrest on July 2, 2019 in Los Ebanos, Texas.
John Moore | Getty Images
The Supreme Court authorizes the nationwide application of a new rule of the Trump administration that prevents most immigrants from Central America from seeking asylum in the United States. United States.
The order issued Wednesday by the judges temporarily cancels a decision of a lower court that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border. The policy is to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country to go to the United States without seeking protection.
Most people crossing the southern border are Central American Americans fleeing violence and poverty. They are largely ineligible under the new rule, as are asylum-seekers from Africa, Asia and South America who regularly arrive at the southern border.
The reverse change of decades of American politics. The administration said it wanted to bridge the gap between a first asylum check that most people go through and a final asylum decision that most people do not make.
Judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the order of the High Court. "Once again, the executive has issued a rule that seeks to put an end to long-standing practices of refugees seeking shelter from persecution," Sotomayor wrote.
The legal challenge to the new policy has a brief but somewhat convoluted history. US Judge Jon Tigar, of the United States District in San Francisco, prevented the new policy from taking effect at the end of July. A panel of three judges of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has restricted Tigar's order to apply only in Arizona and California, states included in the 9th Circuit.
This left the administration free to enforce the policy regarding asylum seekers arriving in New Mexico and Texas. On Monday, Tigar issued a new order reaffirming the control of asylum policy at the national level. The 9th circuit again reduced its order on Tuesday.
The action of the high courts leaves the administration free to impose the new policy everywhere while the case against it continues.
[ad_2]
Source link