[ad_1]
It is built like a three-stroke racket. First, a title and an estimate are presented to the visitor once the walls are walled up with large photographs of a series of mass events held in Sweden, ranging from large ballots to early voting rights to the hometown for a tightening of working conditions in the 1930s and the struggle. against nuclear weapons in the 1950s. This highlights the importance of collective battles for victories.
It's serious now. Make a contribution to the ETC Support Fund to ensure the publication of Sweden's only red-green daily newspaper. Use the ETC department store or:
Swisha123 508 754 9
BG: 5372-9141
Then we enter a long distance room where a series of screens with text and image inform us about different rights. It is the right to vote, the right to one's body, the right to one's sexuality, the right to languages, and so on. The third step is a guide for the teacher. The school material is intended for young people in the ninth grade of primary and secondary school and deals only with the right to the body.
In the introduction, it is indicated the importance of the collective management society in the fight for human rights. Visitors then expect a clear start in the broad and collective battles that the labor movement, the movement of sobriety, the women's movement and other major popular movements have provoked at the turn of the twentieth century and into the twentieth century. , in order to create decent living conditions for all. The fact that it is precisely these broad collective movements that laid the foundation for well-being is not an unknown fact. It is also the longstanding trade union and political struggles for the right to work, for a reasonable salary, for a roof over his head and for the possibility of education that have paved the way for other struggles and struggles. demands for equality and solidarity among all members of society. . But this is done in the exhibition.
Here, instead, a number of individuals are introduced, each of whom has fought for rights at different ages. Their efforts are emphasized in well-meaning texts with a clear note that now we all agree. Admittedly, individuals had a significance as representatives of the movements whose ideas they conveyed, but without great mass movements, their struggle had no chance of succeeding. Why have the authors of the exhibition so consistently opted for all major and absolutely crucial battles, such as the labor movement and the women's movement, for example, for more than a hundred years? Is the format of the exhibition an obstacle? Likewise, they simply can not know the political history of Sweden. Another explanation may be that they deliberately chose to ignore the crucial question which remains the most crucial issue for our human rights; namely the class question.
One might wonder why, but perhaps it is not so strange that these last thirty years signify a powerful political right and a devastating dismantling of what was once called the welfare state. If we consider that the working class no longer exists and that economic equality is a goal that every individual can try to achieve, there is no need to deny totally the victories won by the workers' movement after a struggle. collective long and laborious. Then, of course, it is easier to focus on identity and gender and to highlight the human rights that each individual can defend. The social changes that really go to the depths always result from the actions of broad popular movements. But this knowledge is inherited from this exhibition.
Each match played has one or more opponents. Without resistance, no cause of battle is found. In this exhibition, however, there are no enemies or defined adversaries. Those who oppose rights are a bit diffuse "them", "us" or "the state". The lack of definition of counterparts in the stories of this exhibition makes the examples incomprehensible. Who opposed the right to vote of women in the last century? Because it may not be essential that the declarations of the different parliamentary doors of the first chamber be decisive? The pink circles in the showroom cite a few. But what social forces were there to prevent people from having better living and working conditions? Who opposed the right of women to abortion and why were homosexuals deprived of the right to marry and live with their families? Why have all kinds of sexuality been offended by church-sanctioned marriage?
Because the exhibition is in front Everything is aimed at high school and high school students who feel restrictive and highly educative do not speak only the rights of individuals without placing them in a broader context. It is of course necessary to speak of citizenship and democratic principles, not only in terms of "rights" but also in terms of obligations.
We can not demand anything from the state, as in a democratic society with parliamentary governance, it is created to represent our common will and perceptions. As citizens, we also have an obligation to contribute to the development of the community. What kind of individuals do we form in our students by respecting the obligations and emphasizing the rights as they present themselves in this exhibition? How will young people growing up today participate in future rights struggles if we have not identified resistance? And how should they understand that the strength lies in the organization and the merger?
Unfortunately, when the social-democratic ideology is replaced by the neoliberal in almost every field, society is no longer to fear the labor movement. A much needed awareness in Sweden requiring more than one story has created a fear of the collective. In these times it is easy to focus on identity politics and in various attempts to advocate for equality and work with the inclusion of minority groups, while real inequality, namely economic inequality between the working class and capital and authority, is not visible.
The focus changes then the idea of a general equality between all citizens for inclusion and compensation for individual groups. But we are after all in a national historical museum, and we must expect the long historical perspectives to be presented and not for the museum to exhibit an exhibition that obviously leaves to visitors the diffuse feeling that the only thing left for us is a hard, a ridiculous. and the disgusting past from which we should all go.
Ewa Bergdahl, historian of culture and director of the fd muse, today chair of the workers' association and Maria Sandelsällskapet
Kersti Berggren, architect and business leader at the Värmland Museum, has already worked for the Riksantikvarieämbetet.
Footnote: The article of debate had already been published in a longer version of the staging forum of the exhibition.
Answer right: the fight of each person is important
The 100% match exhibition – The history of Sweden is an exhibition that is part of the continuity of the Heterogena Cultural Heritage Project, a collaboration between the Kristianstad Region Museum, the Museum of Västmanland County, the museum of history and the Sundsvall Museum.
First, an explanation of the three-and-a-half hour row described in the debate article by Ewa Bergdahl and Kersti Berggren. 100% match was a traveling exhibition organized by the Kristianstad Region Museum, with Anna Furumark as an entrepreneur / project manager and with Mikael Eivergård as research director. After being shown in Kristianstad, the exhibition continued its national tour. Each museum has added to the traveling exhibition itself, which includes the individual story of Bergdahl and his article of debate. At the Historical Museum, visitors meet for the first time in space, that is to say the images of the mass events, their own additions. The teacher's guide, which is part of the exhibition, was developed by the Living History Forum in collaboration with the Heterogena Heritage Heritage project.
In each exhibition project, the producer is obliged to make a variety of conscious choices. To make a global exhibition on any subject is, of course, an impossibility. In the 100% battle, the election has fallen to end the struggle of the individual for his fundamental and / or fundamental rights. The struggle of the popular movements is an issue that has already been highlighted in many contexts, even in exhibitions.
That the exhibition chooses to "lift" only the struggle of the individual does not consist in lowering or concealing the collective struggle. This is the election to raise stories that have rarely been reported earlier this time. Perhaps in this egocentric society, even the target audience can be recognized as an individual and see that each person's struggle is important, whether or not it is part of what is described as "big crowd movements" or not.
Anna Hadders, tour leader for 100% match, Kristianstad Region Museum
Anna Hansen, Museum Director / National Archives of Skåne, Kristianstad Region Museum
[ad_2]
Source link
