[ad_1]
Critics include the Bar, where Anne Ramberg is General Secretary:
– As is the case today, the police will not have access to report the tension at the opening of a preliminary investigation. This suggestion means that you will have access to the information, but you will not use it during the preliminary inquiry. And that will have a lot of consequences, "says Anne Ramberg.
"This means in particular that you can not use information that speaks in favor of the suspect."
The signal voltage takes place the Swedish Broadcasting and Defense Service, FRA, and listen for example to data and telecommunications traffic crossing the country's borders to detect threats to Sweden.
Today, the security police and the police do not receive data from the FRA signaling team if a criminal investigation is opened, because the signal tension is part of the intelligence intelligence activities.
The signal voltage is therefore subject to a deep intimacy.
The fact that the police can not access the data when a criminal investigation has been opened has for example been identified as a problem to prevent terrorist attacks in Sweden.
According to the proposal, as Having been the subject of a referral, the security police and the police should be able to continue receiving data from the FRA, even if a criminal investigation is opened.
However, the data can only be used in intelligence work to prevent crime, not in a criminal investigation.
– In practice, it has not been explained how to ensure that this information is not used as a basis for the preliminary investigation and without the accused having the opportunity to obtain the vision to which he is entitled. to, says Anne Ramberg.
In addition to the Bar Association, the defenders of civil rights, the Ombudsman of Justice and the Association of Journalists also belong to those who reject the proposal.
The proposal is supported by The security police, the police, the FRA, the CEO and the Attorney General.
"The bottom line is that you can continue to get important information on various phenomena that concern serious cross-border crimes," said prosecutor Prosecutor Henrik Rasmusson.
"It's a need that is not stopped just before starting a preliminary investigation," continues Henrik Rasmusson.
"The main reason for this settlement is to clarify the border between intelligence and criminal investigation, and thus provide information on intelligence that will provide better tools to detect and prevent very serious crimes," said Henrik Rasmusson. on the prosecutor's office.
Source link
