S-flirt is adventurous in Lööf and Björklund



[ad_1]

Nevertheless, it is ironic that it is not C and L that determine whether Stefan Löfven wins the Prime Minister's vote in parliament. The key role, on the other hand, is the party that neither C nor L want to have anything to do – left party.

If Jonas Sjöstedt is disappointed that Stefan Löfven makes the right turn that the two middle leaders demand, decides to vote against, Löfv's government falls again in parliament. V, with M, KD and SD 182, has a warrant suf fi cient enough to trap Stefan Löfven at a vote of the Prime Minister.

Now, one can of course object that it should be impossible for the Left Party to vote in the same way as the SD.

But the demands made by the Liberals and the C to free a S government must be totally unacceptable to Sjöstedt. As a party leader, one of his problems was putting an end to benefits in social welfare. He is in the process of making a profit because Stefan Löfven needs his support to get through the budget. Something like that, L and C will not accept. But many other things are also unacceptable. Lower initial wage, lost wages tax, free rent in new buildings and more generous deductions. This should also be unthinkable for S, but you know that the government is extremely important to Stefan Löfven and his party. So there should be an important preparation for concessions.

But it will be a difficult balance. If the right turn is too tight, it would be impossible for Jonas Sjöstedt to release Stefan Löfven as Prime Minister. If he starts by getting rid of his influence on the budget, he must be forced to accept pure right politics, so the temptation to press the red button will be difficult.

On the other hand, if Stefan Löfven tries to please the leader of the left, Lööf and Björklund learn to be furious. They promised not to influence V either.

For Annie Lööf and Jan Björklund, flirting with S is adventurous. They both risk betrayal. They had never said before the elections that a no to SD would lead to a yes to Stefan Löfven.

By far, Chief L l 'a. Granted, support for S-cooperation was a little broader than was sometimes suggested. 18-7 on the party council and 13-6 on the parliamentary group. But the problem for him is that there are heavy parliamentarians who say no. The party's economic spokesman, Mats Persson, said, for example, immediately after Björklund's press conference that he felt it was catastrophic to cooperate with S.

Perhaps L's rebels will find comfort in Björklund's answer to the question of what happens if there is no Stefan Löfven in Parliament. He then speculated that it could not be ruled out that the previously rejected government alternative (ie the M + KD government) came back.

[ad_2]
Source link