The left party does not set its own budget: "We take our responsibilities"

In front of a possible scenario in which the transitional government led by Stefan Löfven could be forced to rule the country with a M budget as a compass, the article's authors, Ulla Andersson, economic and political spokesman of the leftist party , and Mia Sydow Mölleby, group leader of the Riksdag V, claimed that it is their party that, in a chaotic position, places political responsibility at the highest level.

The invisible covenant is called "The old alliance" – repeated four times. And the moderates are accused of "setting aside the attitude of Parliament" when the budget process could result in the adoption of the M budget, a budget adopted since the transitional government led by MPs S and MP.

"The moderators have barricaded themselves behind the fact that Sweden has a transitional government, but not a transition day," write Andersson and Sydow Mölleby. They believe that such an attitude "conceals the fact that the relationship between parliament and the government is a delicate combination of constitutional rules and practices". This practice may change, but the authors claim that this is not what "the moderators have expressed, either now or in other contexts".

The cooperation of the leftist party in budgetary matters with the government during the last mandate, as well as the participation "in several cross-border agreements", according to the speakers, are a test of the party's responsibility.

When the SD actively uses to create chaos, while M increasingly depends on the "racist party" of Åkesson, the leftist party defends an action to control and rediscover the money. Over time, Sweden will have a new government in place and each of the parties to the Riksdag will have the opportunity to "present its own economic policy: as the author of the government, as a negotiating party or opponent".