HD will try generous penalties – are there enough one hundred deliveries for maxstraff?



[ad_1]

Hundreds of violence against children must "collectively be punishable by the maximum punishable sentence" – 14 years in prison. She considers that prosecutor Petra Lundh, who has now been seised of the Supreme Court, must investigate whether the Swedish system of multiple crime crimes has reached the ceiling "in this case.

The Kristianstad District Court sentenced the 33-year-old man to eleven years in prison. This sentence was however reduced to nine years imprisonment by the Hovrätt on Skåne and Blekinge.

The verdict covers nearly a hundred cases of serious rape committed on children for about five years and serious sexual abuse on children on many occasions. All the crimes were directed against one and the same child.

"Deeply hurtful and painful"
Prosecutor Petra Lundh appealed the decision to the Supreme Court and asked that the sentence be reduced to 14 years imprisonment. She wrote in her call:

"This is a very serious, deeply abusive and sometimes painful sexual offense, targeting a very young person (child) who, because of his relationship with X (the accused), his Early age at the onset of the assault, her particular vulnerability lacked every opportunity to undergo and thus preserve her sexual integrity, which X used mercilessly to satisfy her own sexual satisfaction for a long time and on many occasions. "

Has reached the ceiling
The minimum penalty for serious rape against a child is four years imprisonment and up to ten years imprisonment. It is also possible to try a maximum of four years' imprisonment for repeated crimes, which in practice means that the maximum sentence can be 14 years imprisonment – which, in this case, should to be tried by UK because the crime committed by the man is "capped".

Generous penalty
According to the Council, the court of appeal applied the so-called principle of aspiration, namely the principle of "repayment of sentence" in case of multiple crime – too generously. RÅ writes in his call:

"The criminal assessment of the Court of Appeal means that only a few of the hundreds of serious acts (including very severe summary convictions) X have been convicted of the overall assessment of the sentence."

"In this case, the case of an extremely serious crime, where the punishment of each act exceeds the minimum penalty, I think that the court in charge of the criminal assessment can conclude that the general difficulty of the crime is such that she deserves the maximum punishable punishment. "

The Supreme Court now decides to issue a probationary license for the length of the sentence.

Free Juridics Newsletter on Legal Affairs and Law – click here

[ad_2]
Source link