Birger Schlaug: Change page: Russian roulette for MP

VIEW

Birger Schlaug: The party is better to lie down and stick to Löfven

This is an article of debate. It is the author who represents the opinions expressed in the text, not Aftonbladet.

DEBATE. Annie Lööf hopes that an Alliance Plus (Alliance and MP) could form a government, or at least a government base, and thus become bigger than the red-green block.

The movement of a play (MP), however, does not lead to the majority of parliament, so the dependence of S or SD would still exist. Moreover, now that Ulf Kristersson has been tested, it turns out that the largest government foundation is either the reddish or the Alliance Plus without the constellation M-KD-SD.

Suddenly, the argument that Lööf and Björklund did not use was retained longer. The most important documents of the government should not form the government. Thanks too …

The situation of the environmental part is quite fragile. Changing a page would be a risky project, only to Russian roulette.

Of course, we could talk about both Gothenburg and Stockholm. In both places, it was decided to change S for the benefit of others. In Gothenburg with V and FI. In Stockholm with the Alliance.

In Gothenburg, as the largest minority bloc with all that that means, it is possible to build an ideologically progressive red-green-pink platform.

In the municipality of Stockholm, it was possible to negotiate – at least as it now seems – what the concrete parties in S did not authorize. Stop for Apple "put Stockholm on the map" by rebuilding Kungsträdgården and stopping for the big Nobel house, here are two of the benefits.

The policy dictated by the parliament and the government, however, is something completely different – as noted by the language pipeline of the environmentalist party. Until now, he opposes Annie Lööf's attempt to form Alliance Plus.

Ulf Kristersson will be able to promise environmentalists a bit of dark about climate change – for example, the air tax may stay and the climate is included seven times more in the financial plan – if this is included in the context of his government.

Perhaps Annie Lööf – as supported by Björklund as the "Green Voice of the Alliance", according to the Nature Conservation Association, would accept the air tax and any tax on diesel that 's included. she does not like it. But just as angry would be addicted to SD.

Worse for MP, however, the party is in danger in the polls. Changing the page, whatever the arguments, should be considered as a high risk project.

If such a government falls into an extraordinary election – or if it will not even be approved after the president's proposal – there should not be a single vote of support from those who actually identify as sossaries or leftist parties.

Should the alliance voters dare to bet their votes on the green accordingly? Barely. In addition, the climate issue in an additional choice may disappear completely, the content of the policy would be moved to the lower box of the office, under the nostalgic graduation panels, rulers and pencils.

Plus, the money is spent in every corner of the green box. To top it off, an additional choice could be related to the European spring elections. And in these elections, the member probably thinks of making a better choice than during the legislative elections. And certainly would do so if only the question of the Swedish government was rejected.

The member is probably doing his best to remain discreet, stick to Löfvensspåret and wait for Lööf and Björklund to be there again. What we already knew after election day.

But the most interesting thing is what happened in Gothenburg. Let it grow. A progressive red-green-pink platform would be a valuable feature of the Swedish debate. Maybe we could get rid of anything that's sustainable.

Let it be the next regular choice.

Birger Schlaug, former linguistic pipeline for the environmental part

⁠ Join the debate and comment on the article
– I like Aftonbladet Debatt on Facebook.

November 15, 2018 1:28 p.m.