[ad_1]
The starting point of
My text on religious feminists (DN, 22/11) was a real person and a kind rather than the all-encompassing beard that I can or do not want to talk about. It would be miraculous for the great writer Frida Park to understand me that day, who in her answer carefully avoids the feminist word and whose main interest seems to be
defend Christian theologians (DN, 28/11).
For the sake of clarity I answer in the form of points.
1. The return of God / religion on good and evil is a term used for decades on the international scene and in Sweden, where the growing importance of religion has been discussed. My use of the term is not meant to point fingers to whoever has written books about it. There is no individual enemy in the text and therefore no personal attack.
2. The impeccable gossip of the text addresses voices that lack experience, not marked by the impending, restrictive and violent repression that religions still exert, for example women and fags, and as Believers from these groups must constantly negotiate.
3. A client wants "virtually every country in the free kingdom" to be committed to people who come here regardless of their beliefs. The article by Martin Aagård
"A prayer for the salvation of Jimmie Åkesson" (Aftonbladet, 5/9) speaks quickly because the freedom of freedom is broken. Something too
The Park Journal noted (Day, 31/5 and
5/9).
4. My goal was neither to ignore nor to name women who share my privileges. What I can regret, however, is that Jewish feminists are invisible in my text.
5. Why Alexandra Pascalidous
text on young Muslim poets (DN, 29/4), so innovative? For those who speak, they are hardly recruited in the group of Pantrarnas printers, but in the group Nöjesguiden. I wrote about what is heard, asking what is very rarely heard.
The important for me So, in 2012, this was Islamophobia, what does it mean to be part of a tradition that repeats the colonization and extermination of people of other religions? Can you write from this position and ask for something else? L & # 39; equity? Then I wondered who was in public and in the feminist movement. This question only concerns someone who has a feminist hope for the future. Then it's the language that he lost. Where is a language that contains both rage and love? Rebellion and submission? Who is as faithful to the experience as the religious tradition?
Finally, believe the very thing. This urgent call for help to survive some days, a whole regret and the loss of those who took away the death. But also a kind of prayer to face nationalism and fascism growing up with nothing but pure terror.
The most important thing does not happen here, in the newspaper. But sometimes it happens. The miracle on my part is that every letter and every encouraging call of the past few days has frightened us loneliness and taught us that many of us know something about the language that can be, after all.
Read the text from Elisabeth Hjorth: "The religious feminist is an unmanageable provocation"
Source link
