[ad_1]
Djingis Khan continually conquered new territories and put them in gravel and ash.
Stefan Löfven has neither done that nor the other. That is why, on one side, it would be good for someone else to become Prime Minister. That is why, on the other hand, there is no disaster of apocalyptic dimension if the formation of the government ends as it began, with Löfven in the Sagerka house.
Sweden should Need a government ready to boost the horse. A long series of reforms is waiting to be launched and implemented. It would have been nice if the Alliance had won the elections and got the mandate to do what the Social Democrats had not organized or wanted to do so far.
But now it has not happened. The outrage of the bourgeois public expresses the fact that the end result of the formation of the government may be that Löfven reigns further seems so difficult and easy to overcome. You can say a lot about the Social Democrats, but they have not yet turned Sweden into a landscape of smoky ruins, although they have been able to do so for most of the past hundred years.
Pragmatism exists, good and bad, in the party DNA. When Gustaf V feared for the future of the 1919 revolution, he was sighed in front of a Social Democratic Finance Minister's consul and former shoemaker Fredrik Vilhelm Thorsson, who slapped him on the shoulder while telling him : "The Majesty should not worry, this file can be done."
Now, it can be said that the social-democratic record has become more than legally appreciated, but the fact remains: S is present in two of the four party formations that President Andreas Norlén had during Tuesday's therapeutic group sessions and is in practice needed as a partner of the two others. According to the election results, the Social Democrats will play a key role in every government imaginable. Civil sympathizers should rather than go home with Halloween hysteria, wondering which of the bad government alternatives is the least bad, which offers the best opportunities to move to the politics of the day. liberal alliance.
The Social Democrats have not yet transformed Sweden into a landscape of smoky ruins
Paradoxically Can it act of a minority social democratic government in the current situation? This does not mean that S will have the power "forever" (as it is sometimes expressed in the debate) with a new version of the December agreement. Instead, it's about maximizing the bourgeoisie's freedom of movement on a board where several awkward places are blocked.
An alliance government, or worse, a right-wing government (M plus KD), supported by Swedish Democrats, is unthinkable for many reasons. One of them, too seldom mentioned, is that the SD is not a bourgeois party, but a party whose leaders ironically romance the "home", the period of Swedish history where social democracy was the more hegemonic.
A government coalition with S and one or more parties of the alliance is not impossible, but from a risky liberal point of view. If some parts of the bourgeoisie have a distorted image of S (Djingis Khan), then S always has a skewed self-image (government party of God's grace). Any partner in the coalition could therefore find misery and misery during the recession.
The parties liberated by Löfven, the Center and the Liberals are probably trying to let him remain alone and continue to tempt him with collaborators. At best, this could lead to a number of good things: a liberal justice policy. The left party is marginalized. SD is isolated. S pulls right. The Alliance can be preserved, albeit in smart bags, and better off in the next election.
Source link
