[ad_1]
Publication Update
Leader
The release was scheduled. The proposal to the City Council, voted by the moderates, the Social Democrats, the Center Party and the Swedish Democrats, was in many ways a blow in the air.
The municipalities – M, S and C – would probably show "doing something". This became a model that probably believed that the County Council of Södermanland would approve, since his counterpart of Skåne had already stopped the Vellinge begging offer, on the grounds that begging was not considered to be hindering public order. Why would he be considered as Eskilstuna?
Regardless of what the case will probably go further in administrative law and chamber law, both of which have failed Vellinge's ban. Therefore, the case should also be decided on Eskilstuna
But that does not mean that the issue of begging is out of the world. Swedish moderators and democrats want to ban begging on a national scale, and social democrats often support proposals that make begging difficult. Prime Minister Stefan Löfven was questioned about the fact that it did not exclude the general exclusion of the social democrats. again (TT, 26 / 12-2017). In the same spirit, Ardalan Shekarabi (S), Minister of Civil Affairs, quickly supported and supported the Eskilstuna model, as it is reasonable "to try to find a solution" (Current, 30/1), while more and more people are supporting. According to the SVT survey last spring, more than one in four municipalities, mostly civic, but also with S-management, wants to ban begging, like Katrineholm Göran Dahlström City Council (S).
So, SD is not impossible with Jimmie Åkesson, in the foreground, will attempt to beg for a poll, and deal with migration and law and order. If this happens, it is important that the Liberal parties, who have waived a ban, adhere to the principle that my right to strike where your nose begins.
It is the principle that people are free to act as they wish, provided that it does not interfere with someone else or involves a large part of them. ; self-harm. With this as a guiding principle, one can not come to a conclusion different from that of the right of a person to passively ask for help, the "right" of passers-by dare not be contradicted by seeing people in need
.
[ad_2]
Source link