[ad_1]
The 28 Swedish supervisory boards decide what happens if a person found guilty of lightness or parole fails. Each board is chaired by a judge who also has a substitute and is paid quarterly according to a particular rule.
The chambers are their own authorities, but the public ministry administers the payments. In this country, it has been discovered that royalty levels vary considerably between different oversight committees. According to an internal survey, about one third of social protection committees have applied a practice that does not support the regulatory framework – and, according to the criminal investigation commission, believes the wealth is high.
That could be a difference of 10,000 SEK for a quarter or 40,000 a year – a total of several million crowns over the years for current judges.
Judges' dissatisfaction
Recently, the correctional court interrupted payments in anticipation of its own investigation and, once again, the judges' bills were again published, applying a stricter interpretation across the country.
The action caused great dissatisfaction vis-à-vis the judges who received their compensation. The prosecution turned to the government and today the Department of Justice held a meeting on the subject.
The prosecution is still trying to find out whether the strictest interpretation will be applied retroactively, that is, if judges are to pay back the bad legacy of work in recent years.
Source link
