[ad_1]
It is believed that the origin of the murder of this 30-year-old man is a pharmacy that went wrong
The thesis of Attorney Andreas Bergman and Attorney Charlotte Österlund is that a nod to Missing
– We have a theory and evidence that something went wrong and that you lost a lot of medicines for which you have to pay. If you can not pay on time, you can take other measures. That's what we think is the context, "said Attorney Andreas Bergman in an earlier interview with the Evening Post.
If it's the victim who left the drug, he does not know it still.
READ MORE: Theory: Knark disappeared – then murdered twins
Source: Police Forecasting
DNA Track
The man received three shots in the night of 8 to 9 January. The fatal blow should have been lost when the 30-year-old fell to the ground. The man was found in a forest section, next to Riksväg 25 in height in Marbäck in the municipality of Halmstad.
Friday the second day was held at the Halmstad District Court. There, prosecutors raised the evidence against the twin brothers and the other two suspects
One of the evidence against the alleged couple is the DNA on the cartridges found at the scene of the crime
– there is DNA on a cartridge. used on the site. But he is so burned that he can not be related to the brothers, not to my client or both. You can not attach yourself to anyone, "says Björn Hurtig, a defense lawyer for one of the twins.
He believes that DNA can be to his advantage and that of the client since it is not possible to connect to the client.
– The evidence of DNA is strong for us because it can not be related. They do not have direct links to the individual and the place. Then it comes to light against the brothers.
Ulrik Smedberg, who defends one of the other suspects, agrees with the thoughts of Björn Hurtig
– The cartridge was in the gun and was not drawn. But as always, you have to look in perspective. The fact that there is DNA on an undrawn piece is not a proof that someone was on the spot. There is no direct evidence linking anyone, "said Ulrik Smedberg.
READ MORE: The 30-year-old man was shot in the head – at left to die in the woods
Peo Möller
Telephoning
In addition to the DNA trail, the prosecution also reported a phone outburst committed by the police
Björn Hurtig and Ulrik Smedberg argue that interception does not occur. Is not strong enough. ] – There are phone tests, but conversation or silence does not mean that they commit murder. You can not report the contact more than actually. But it's a Katthult killer joke based on this evidence, says Björn Hurtig.
– The evidence they recorded did not mean anything. Nothing in the conversation reinforces the statement, says Ulrik Smedberg.
Björn Hurtig intended to refuse the telephone as evidence, according to the related principle.
If a parent does not want to testify against a parent,. The police who conducted the interrogation is also not called.
"Very Hypotheses"
During the following day of testing, it is the turn of the defense to begin.
Björn Hurtig believes that today 's trial has run its course, but it raises the work of the prosecution.
– There are many assumptions. Lack of evidence and concrete things. You almost force for arguments that are hollow. They slide in the ice and cut to save and it is not enough. But they did well with the conditions.
The evening position sought two defense lawyers for the accused without success.
All crimes deny.
Source link
