LO has already said no to L and C

Jan Björklund said at his press conference on Wednesday, the day after Annie Lööfs, that S had to make a "strong right turn" to be released.

The demands of the two bourgeois parties largely coincide and concern several issues where the S and intermediate parties are farther apart, such as market rent, tax cuts, and the like. The breakup of Las. Björklund challenges Löfven to ignore LO, but he can not. LO sits on the S party council, finances them and is part of its DNA.

The hours before the play of Jan Björklund, LO, Byggo, Seko and IF Metall, invited Stefan Löfven not to yield to the requirements of Annie Lööf. Do not touch Las, labor law or wage formation was the message.

The conflict is also clear in the report that LO published a few days ago. There, the union advocates totally non-existent actions. Tax on inheritance and donations restored, which will be progressive. Taxing the shareholder of a few companies is more difficult. Remove the lump sum tax from the investment savings account.

LO neglects Taxes on inheritance, donations and wealth are provided by the richest, otherwise they leave the country, as history shows. The capital tax is dynamic, which means that a lower tax rate can result in higher tax revenues. In addition, the money was reinvested, which we found when founders of companies such as Klarna and Skype reduced their profits in new ideas and companies that make Sweden turn.

LO writes that economic conditions (inequalities) spread between generations. Rich parents have rich children and vice versa. The federation ignores the fact that education and entrepreneurship are at least as important factors for classroom travel and that dependency is also reproducing. The increase in contributions does not therefore lead to an increase in equality in the essential sense of the term.

It's the difference between those who work and those who do not work. We must aim to increase class trips and reduce inequalities and exclusion. If the union meant seriousness with the ambition of equality, it would be more difficult to strengthen the education system.

LO is not in agreement In practice, the importance of the level and design of taxation for a dynamic climate of success for young and growing companies. Nor do they see the importance of business for growth. Individual saving does not need to be stimulated, it is enough for the state to do it.

It is clear that LO and C / L have fundamentally different worldviews and solutions to political problems. The right-left scale lives and thrives in Sweden, and C and L must reasonably be aware of it.