"No reason to criticize the law firm"



[ad_1]

Recently, DN revealed that one lawyer had not been extended to a reputable law firm after denouncing a colleague for rape – a two-year prison sentence for the district court.

The woman had a trial appointment and the employer had chosen not to let him hold a permanent job.

In this regard, a new meta-campaign was formed among the lawyers.

"Immediate cessation of sexualization, marginalization, exploitation and downgrading of women in our sector", the requirement under the promotional name is "Proof of Evidence" – widespread by many people :

https://twitter.com/linnea_claeson/status/1065668196097761283?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1065668196097761283&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.expressen.se%2Fnyheter%2Fefter-juristvaldtakt-nytt-metooupprop- among the lawyers 2F%

Previously, the general secretary of the Bar did not want to comment on the case. At present, DN reports that Anne Ramberg has made direct contact with the competent law firm.

– I have written to the law firm and I have received an answer that I accept and which I am satisfied. But I do not intend to report on this in Dagens Nyheter or any other newspaper, "she told the paper.

– I have a base that makes me have no reason to criticize the law firm.

Not relevant to continue the case

It is suspected that a lawyer may have been guilty of a violation or a violation of the practices of a good lawyer, the disciplinary council of the court. Danish Bar Association can conduct an investigation.

The Corporate Secretary of the Company may open such an investigation, and Anne Ramberg has already done so on several occasions.

Anne Ramberg sees no reason to bring the case before the Disciplinary Board.

Photo: ANNA-KARIN NILSSON

But bringing the case to the Disciplinary Board is irrelevant, she says adding:

"The company's job is to supervise law enforcement agencies, which means we have to make sure they comply with the rules of good law enforcement, which means that they comply with the law." existing legislation and directives.

The court hearing will end on December 3.

[ad_2]
Source link