No, there is no peace in parliament



[ad_1]

A government that has failed to maintain its position on economic policy, if the budget of the transitional government is adopted.

Nobody could have lost the message. Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson (S) made the yesterday's press conference on the principles of the government a reality for further work on the transition budget.

Magdalena Andersson provided information during the press conference.

Photo: ? Thommy Tengborg / TT

Magdalena Andersson provided information during the press conference.

Some keywords have been rhetorically repeated many times. The budget should be "reduced" and "without political orientation of the party". An acceding government can then mark its economic policy with an amending budget.

This is not really the whole truth. Tax changes must be decided in time for the end of the year to come into effect in 2019. No budget changes or spring proposals can change. So, if Ulf Kristersson is elected prime minister, he gets a red-green budget, since he can add a budget with alliance content next fall.

It is only in a technocracy that a budget can be without a political party. Although no reform, increased spending or economy characterizes a transition budget, the previous priorities are the same, which in some cases probably have a majority in parliament today. The transition budget is reddish and not neutral.

It has been assumed that the government should reduce the tax on retirement while giving more money to the defense. Two issues for which there is a large cross-border majority.

But the Minister of Finance has not answered these questions. Reasonably, because Ulf Kristersson is not able to call the government card for consideration by the moderates, he will present a budget motion to the Riksdag to win the transition budget.

Magdalena Andersson's rhetoric aims to give the impression that a kind of peace of mind will prevail in the event of the government's disappearance. The (Ulf Kristersson) who has probably tabled a budget motion violates the view of any type of unmodified order. This creates a mess. Then parliamentary realities are reversed against Kristersson. It is for a government to adopt adopts its budget while it is an example of opposition that an opposition politician seeks to get support for his option. policy.

[ad_2]
Source link