[ad_1]
The event took place during the last meeting of the Allsvenskan between Djurgården and Malmö.
Just before half-time, Haris Radetinac of the local team played against Arot Traustason. He first encountered the double on the foot of the island, which forced him out with a ligament injury.
Radetinac survived without any map. Later, Malmö FF chose to report the incident to the Discipline Committee, which released Radetinac.
The motivation was that Judge Kristoffer Karlsson had seen the incident and that the decision on the plan was irrevocable.
"Even if the referee has missed the shot on the Malmö player's leg / foot, it means that the situation is judged by the referee during the match and the trial has not given rise to a punishment. committee is therefore not able to review the notification without rejecting the application ", writes the disciplinary council.
The TV profile: "Must be clearer"
However, this reasoning has several profiles to react.
Discovery journalist Jonas Dahlquist – who first published his reviews on Twitter – says it is against the decision to lift Paulinho's suspension at Häcken after receiving a second yellow card for the shoot.
– The rules must be clearer. We can not say once that we can change the decision later so that we can not do it next time. All this is unreasonable, says Dahlquist.
https://twitter.com/jonas_dahlquist/status/1152095416248348672
The referee missed the stamp
He also questioned the Discipline Council's statement that the judge, according to the ruling, had seen the incident but had forgotten that Radetinac had met with Traustason's foot.
– It is quite impossible to say that he sees the situation but not that the bone strikes. This can be said. If he sees the situation, he sees that the leg is affected, that is the real situation in this case.
Have you been surprised that he is released?
– Very surprised. If the judge says that he has seen the situation but does not take a verdict, he commits himself a huge mistake and may rest a few turns. There is no logic in that, that he sees the situation but not the stamp.
President: "It will be a little VAR-feeling"
Kerstin Elserth, Chair of the Discipline Committee, explains that the regulation says that it is possible to recover yellow or red cards that have been incorrectly distributed, but does not alter decisions that have not failed nothing of the plan.
– In this situation, the judge has decided to do nothing and we do not have the opportunity to review it. You might think it's strange, but the system is so arranged, she says.
The judge says that he saw the situation but not the stamp itself. Can you really say that he saw the situation then?
– Just because he missed part of the situation, we can not go there and change it. We can have the discussion if we should be able to look at each individual case of the plan, but I do not think anyone wants it that way. It will be a little VAR-feeling about it, that we will be like were retrospectively.
Olof Lundh: Do as in SHL
To avoid ambiguities, the Discipline Committee should review the equivalent of SHL according to TV4 expert, Olof Lundh.
– I think we need to copy some parts of what SHL has with a faster and more professional discipline committee. Allsvenskan, which aspires to become the best league of the Nordic countries, should also follow a process of discipline that more people understand, he said.
Lundh believes that it is up to both SvFF and Sef to create a change in the process so that it becomes more modern.
– It's an untimely system. This is obvious for uncertainties and misunderstandings.
– I know that football fans generally react negatively when they mention SHL, but they are an example in this case. A clear and fast process is communicated to the video clips of the event. Football won the same thing, said Olof Lundh.
[ad_2]
Source link
