[ad_1]
Work, but new copyright laws in the EU have been going on for several years and are now approaching their final stages. But the proposal sparked intense debate over whether the new law is too stringent and risks harming a free and open Internet.
The criticisms mainly concerned sections 11 and 13 of the bill. The first is that the media will be repaid by social media companies like Facebook or Twitter, when they are linked to their news articles on the sites.
Article 13 proposes to filter copyright on social media music or movies are downloaded illegally. Several copyright organizations are positive and see the need for enhanced protection for artists and artists. However, activists in the network warn against the "liaison fee", censorship and mass surveillance.
Proposal was passed by the Legal Committee in June and voted on Thursday if the disputed proposal is to be amended or not. He moves on to a final decision. The issue sparked tremendous commitment, with several MPs telling SVT that they received thousands of emails from worried people before the vote.
The Alliance says no – wanting several adjustments
The questionnaire of the Swedish Ministry of Culture shows a great political unity. 20 Swedish parliamentarians criticize the law in their current state. Alliance parties are generally in favor of a strong copyright, but believe the proposal is too broad and may be harmful to small businesses and individuals
– Requirements of the platform to review and filter the content, "explains Christofer Fjellner (M), on why the moderators oppose the proposal in its current form.
– Obviously, creators of copyrighted material will be paid fairly. But the decision taken by the Legal Committee risks destroying the Internet as we know it today. According to Fredrick Federley, the green-red parties want to end the proposal
The European representatives of the Social Democrats, the Party of the Environment and The left party is negative to the proposal.
"Artists and artists must be paid for their work, but this should not be to the detriment of personal integrity or fundamental rights and freedoms." It is important to preserve the character of the Internet ", said Marita Ulvskog, Social Democratic parliamentarians, Olle Ludvigsson, Jytte Guteland, Aleksander Gabelic and Anna Hedh in a joint statement.
– As they appear now, Article 11 and It's just a free and open Internet, says Malin Björk, on the attitude of the Left Party at this time. subject
SD and FI are critical
Swedish Democrats also completely condemn the proposal and will vote no Thursday
– Of course Are we negative to the new copyright directive, since the articles 11 and 13 can be interpreted as a very powerful censorship of works and downloaded files, "said Kristina Winberg, MEP for the Swedish Democrats.
Soraya Post in Feminist Initiative will also vote No. Post sees the proposal as unclear and risky, and therefore wishes to see changes before the Parliament continues.
– We want this directive to be an important step towards better conditions for cultural creators when their es are used and distributed online. what she hopes will happen if the current proposal is stopped.
Source link
