[ad_1]
Leader center Annie Lööf gave a testimony on Tuesday afternoon to "consider releasing or tolerating Stefan Löfven". It is about freer renting, liberal labor legislation, a sharply reduced marginal tax, freedom of choice in social protection, and more. A reform of the rural reform (which, in the case of C, removes including the general protection of the sale of alcohol on the beach and on the farm).
It must be assumed that Stefan Löfven says no, the list fundamentally challenges social democratic beliefs. That knows Annie Lööf. When she gave up her probation assignment last week, it was because it was impossible to find contact points in the areas that now stand to be her list of requirements. She said the list is not negotiable. This is acceptable or rejected.
It seems that it is Annie Lööf who wants to say the most to Stefan Löfven.
Within the Liberals the battle is more or less open as to how the party should choose. According to information provided by Expressen, a strategy within the party may be waiting for how The Center Party act then take a stand for his own part. In this case, the logic could be that the party does not need to assume the responsibility for a substitution, either by following C above the blocking limit, or by not following it. 39, having not done. The Liberals with only 20 terms are not enough to free Löfven with a red-green mandate. The party of the center with its 31 mandates gives a majority of 175 mandates.
But even if it is the C warrant that matters, the Liberals must also take their choice seriously. Jan Björklund has repeatedly stressed that the question of prime ministers is linked to the possibility for the government to consolidate its policies.
And even mathematics support it: for an S government to work without the influence of the left party, the Liberals must vote in favor of the S budget. Otherwise, the moderate alternative budget will be won by the KD and SD votes.
About the Liberals Thus, he is desirous that V does not receive too much influence, L must assume the responsibility of his choice. If you publish S, you must support the S budget.
Ulf Kristersson emphasized throughout the government's educational process that he wanted to pursue the policies of the alliance. He went further than that and proposed a reduction in welfare (something that Mr. Blocked during the eight years of government). The idea of emphasizing the alliance was of course to facilitate the choice of C and L. Ulf Kristersson simply proposed the economic policy for which C and L were chosen.
Paradoxically, this strategy may have made things more difficult for C and L, as it arguably argued that an alliance government would be dependent on sustainable development. By focusing on the concept of alliance, C and L are included in this predictive dependence on sustainable development.
In the DN interview where Annie Lööf presented her list of candidates, she did not mention the alliance just once. Instead, she spoke of the center as a bourgeois party. When C stops talking about cooperation that is no longer available, she can open new avenues, especially since Annie Lööf has started submitting case law requirements.
Ulf Kristersson can reasonably say yes to everything on Annie Lööf's list. Without prejudice to the rhetoric of the alliance, C should be able to vote for a mixed government.
Ulf Kristersson's understanding of C & L's dilemmas is understood by a debate that heavy municipal politician Torkild Strandberg (left) wrote in Expressen. He states that there is a lengthy document in which M has made a very generous offer to L. There is a lot of liberal politics and a promise of considerable influence for L. According to the document, the liberals would benefit always full freedom of action in the House without this holding against them.
It is assumed that C received the same offer.
It is important that a government can use its budget in the Riksdag. At the same time, the question should be seen for what it is. It is economic policy and not other problems. If the SD wants to budget budget support with concessions in other areas, the party can only give power to its words by voting with S. It is almost impossible.
With his list of needs Annie Lööf put the case policy at the center. And she should take the consequences of the unlikely Löfven coming. And release Ulf Kristersson.
Source link
