[ad_1]
It is easy to notice that Stefan Löfven has evolved very little in the constituency until now. The discussion focused mainly on migration and law and order. And there are no social democrats to win. Even if the numbers are not as catastrophic as in Gothenburg, it really proves that the party has had its worst legislative elections since 1911.
Yes, we have to go back so far in time to find an election S of less than 30%
Therefore, it is now time to save the survivors and return as much as possible to the election.
Defensive Taxes
Stefan Löfven identified well-being as the place of attraction of voters.
How many times has there been, in recent weeks, warned of a formidable voice of "tax cuts for the rich" that he believes what does the Alliance want to put in place if it forms a government? How many times has he not tried to give the fall of the fall the "referendum on welfare" label?
If this gives the desired effect remains to be seen, but on Thursday we have an example of what this means in concrete politics.
The Social Democrats had attracted an important media brief in Rome, a few kilometers east of Visby, where Prime Minister and Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson had called for a press conference on homes of retirement.
Selects voters before mingel
There was, of course, even political tactics behind the choice to place the Gotland campaign game. Stefan Löfven, who chose Almedalen last year, began to tell us that he spent the last days traveling in Sweden – "No one can travel and meet the heroes who built and built our country "- and ended by sitting with staff and housing at home. Instead of rushing directly to a radio or television program broadcast by the leaders of other parties.
It is to send signals and show what is most important. To enter the bubble of Almedals often questioned with force? Or to sit down and talk about the beast in Rome with an aging?
Old and New Suggestions
Among all this, we were told that Social Democrats are opting for a number of improvements in the pension system. Some points were known before, like wishing older people who have more than 600 more crowns in the month.
A point was brand new and larger. Before the introduction of the pension system in the mid-1990s, the ambition was for everyone to receive at least 70% of their final salary at retirement. That has never been the case, but by increasing the share paid by employers, the Social Democrats want to do it.
Costs of $ 15 billion
This would result in an increase in costs for employers of about $ 15 billion. little do not know. Much remains to be done to make the proposal a reality. Negotiations within the pension group will be necessary and it is difficult to say where they will end up.
In any case, it will take time. The Minister of Finance first responded to the fact that there will be people who will retire in a few years and who will benefit from the change. It was only after a few more questions that the message was most clear: those who are now 20 to 30 years old will receive 70% of their final salary at retirement. If everything is set up as planned.
Source link
