[ad_1]
- Michael Cohen, former lawyer of US President Donald Trump, is currently reversing his relationship with Trump
- until recently, when he was considered one of Trump's most loyal collaborators, Galt Cohen now processing incriminating information The public
- Observers speculate that he might want to testify to the special investigator Robert Mueller.
There were times when Michael Cohen was even ready to "capture a ball for the president". It was in September 2017. A few days ago, former Donald Trump's lawyer almost declared war on his former boss. Cohen tries to save his skin. Or as you say beautifully in the American: He throws Trump under the bus. In other words, better for him than me.
For Trump, Cohen was what we call a "fixer": he cleaned up the problems of the New York billionaire. Until now, he was considered loyal. Now he has become surprisingly offensive against the president. On Tuesday, his lawyer sent CNN an audio recording of a conversation with Trump in 2016, secretly recorded by Cohen.
COHEN: And I was with Allen Weisselberg [CFOdel'organizationTrump Ed. ] talked about how to organize everything …
TRUMP: And, what? 39, should we pay for it? 150? (Which means $ 150,000, ed. )
The recording shows Trump and Cohen talking about buying rights from a story with Karen McDougal, a Playboy model the 90s, entertained. She claims to have had an affair with Trump for nearly a year in 2006.
What did Trump know about the hoax?
McDougal Magazine The National Enquirer paid $ 150,000 just before the presidential election for the rights of this story – and then withheld the report. Trump is friends with magazine group director David Pecker. Cohen also mentions a certain "David" on the band
COHEN: I talked to everyone when the time came for funding, which …
TRUMP: Wait a second, what funding? [19659006COHEN:EhbienjedoisluipayerSomething
TRUMP: [unverständlich] pay in cash …
COHEN: No, no, no, no, no. I understood.
TRUMP: … check.
The recording is incomplete and is therefore interpreted differently. Whatever the case may be, progressive American media view the recording as evidence that Trump knew quite well that women who claimed to be ex-lovers were receiving silent money. The fact that he apparently wanted to pay "in cash", see Trump's critics as an indication that he wanted to disguise the payments. If these expenses were secretly funded and funded by the Trump campaign team, they would be criminally relevant because they would have violated the eligibility laws.
"The good news is that your favorite president has done nothing wrong to"
Trump revolts as always on Twitter : "What kind of lawyer would take his client? So sad! It happens for the first time, j & Have I ever heard? "And then," Why was the recording interrupted so abruptly that I probably said positive things? "
[ad_2]
Source link
