[ad_1]
The election commission on Friday elected former cricket star Imran Khan. According to official election results, the Khan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party won 114 seats in parliament in Islamabad, the Pakistani Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) only 63.
To govern alone, the PTI would need 137 seats, she does not have a coalition partner yet. The surprisingly strong performance of Khan's party and the number of protracted votes raised doubts as to the legality of the election.
Most parties talked about electoral fraud. The PML-N, which has been in power since 2013, had already accused the army before the elections of manipulating the election in favor of Khan. "We will start a movement for new elections. There will be protests, "said Maulana Fazalur Rehmen, leader of the Islamic party JUI-F, on behalf of an alliance of more than a dozen parties
Shahbaz Sharif, brother of the 39, Former head of government Nawaz Sharif, he promised his support for the protest party alliance, but he still had to consult with his party to see if the elected members would boycott their swearing. there were "worse" and "unprecedented" irregularities in the elections.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's Pakistan People's Party (PPP) won 43 seats and, according to experts from a government of PTI coalition, could provide Get a majority. "Zardari also rejected the election results, but did not join the protest alliance.
The PTI, however, ruled out an alliance with the PPP. He is already in contact with independent deputies of the province of Punj ab, traditional stronghold of the previous ruling party, the PML-N.
The Khan winner has rejected the allegations of manipulation: the elections had been "the most fair and transparent" in Pakistani history. His victory had already claimed the 65-year-old on Thursday. Khan, who led the Pakistani cricket team at the World Cup in 1992, entered politics 22 years ago. Opponents claim to be close to Islamists.
The election commission also resisted the allegations. The delays in the counting of votes would have technical reasons. It does not matter, "these elections were fair and transparent".
An independent group of electoral observers, the Network of Free and Fair Elections (FAFEN), said that "the extent of procedural irregularities during the elections" had been "relatively low". EU election observers, however, have expressed concerns about "an obvious lack of equal opportunities" and a deterioration compared to 2013. (SDA)
Published 28.07.2018 | Updated at 00:46
[ad_2]
Source link
