[ad_1]
Pierre Maudet is counted. The Swiss FDP and the Cantonal Party called on the Geneva Board of Governors to resign. But Maudet does not want to resign. This behavior is a shame not only for the FDP, but for the reputation of the whole policy, says political scientist Georg Lutz.
Georg Lutz
Professor of Political Science
SRF News: Is Pierre Maudet hurting the FDP?
Georg Lutz: He certainly does not do a favor to the party. The longer this case is, the more the image is damaged. And whatever happens now: the party leadership has called today clearly to resign. He almost showed it by saying: No, it does not concern him.
The FDP has long been striving to get rid of its image as a banker and the economy.
These are things that do no good to any party. She's not the only one right now. I think the party has now managed to speak clearly at the national and cantonal level and to say that it does not tolerate that. This is at least a first step to limit the damage.
FDP tips have a clear text. Did his party ask a politician in Switzerland to retire with such harsh words?
This is of course rare. Most critics – especially other party members – but a little softer. It can be suggested that someone thinks of something and its positions. The fact that there are now very clear demands for resignation, which I actually remembered the last time Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf was elected to the Federal Council.
Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf was last elected to the Bundesrat.
Your party, the Prime Minister, has also advised him not to accept the post or to resign immediately. But otherwise, communication is often a little more diplomatic, because after all, it's about party friends.
Aspirations for a party committee. Maudet, however, retains her position as State Councilor.
It's like that. Mr. Maudet was elected by the people for a full term. She has just started. Nobody can force him to resign. Only Mr. Maudet can decide to resign from his government office. What the party leadership means at the cantonal and national levels is formally totally irrelevant.
What the party leadership means at the cantonal and national levels is formally totally irrelevant.
Would this have been the case if Pierre Maudet had been elected to the Federal Council?
It would have been exactly like that. There is also a person elected until the end of the legislature. He will go until 2019 and no one would have forced him to resign.
Why is there no dismissal procedure in Switzerland?
If you want to introduce such a thing, you have to find a mechanism allowing people to decide on a resignation. This is also correct of the system. But if the people decide, we need procedures. They do not usually go fast. In many cases, the time period expired anyway until the end of the procedure.
Does Pierre Maudet harm the reputation of politics?
This is a problem. And that's probably what annoys a lot of people who are not even part of the FDP. Politicians and political parties do not have a very high reputation among the people. Such cases do not help, it will improve.
Such cases do not help to improve the reputation of the policy.
For many, it's frustrating. I think most politicians are really here to work for the common good. You invest a lot of time without being paid. Of course, they do not favor individual cases that do a lot of harm to the people.
The interview was conducted by Barbara Büttner.
Source link
