[ad_1]
Launch of the Tempo 140 Pilot Project on the A1 West Highway on August 1, 2018
Faster until the finish line on well-developed motorways with the most modern and safe vehicles – Under this motto, at the initiative of the Federal Ministry of Transport, the 39 Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) August 1, 2018 Highway A1 West. Between Melk and Oed in Lower Austria and between Haid and Sattledt in Upper Austria, the maximum speed is increased by ten kilometers per hour. The new speed limit applies both on the Vienna directional lane and in the direction of Salzburg. The selection of sections was based on road safety criteria.
The ÖAMTC can imagine an increase in the speed limit, but would prefer an electronic flexibilisation of the speed limits. The advantage of a flexible cruise control is that, under adverse road or weather conditions, speed limits can also be reduced. "Faster in good conditions, slower in adverse conditions," says Martin Hoffer, a lawyer from the ÖAMTC. The evaluation will show in August 2019 how the upper speed limit is assumed and its consequences for road safety and the environment.
Effectiveness of the speed limit first
The environmental organization VIRUS is opposed to an increase in speed limits on highways. "At least as important as their exact height is the guarantee of their respect by technical measures, here BM Hofer must first start," spokesman Wolfgang Rehm said.
The environmental organization VIRUS opposes an increase in speed limits on highways. "At least as important as their exact height is the guarantee of their respect by technical measures, here BM Hofer must start above all," said spokesman Wolfgang Rehm.
Mushroom List: Irresponsible Action
The club's president, Bruno Rossmann, states, "It is obvious that a higher speed means an increase in pollutant emissions, so with the speed of 140, we run even faster in the climate collapse. "
The higher speed not only increases the impact on the environment, but also the fuel consumption, the noise level and the risk of accident. "The increased emissions of nitric oxide and particulate matter, mainly from road traffic, are leading to premature death and disease, especially among children." The fact that Minister Hofer is dangerously putting the health of Austrians at risk is irresponsible, "says Rossmann
Tempo 140 Endangers the Environment and Neighbors
"Tempo 140 harms the environment and constitutes a danger for road users", criticized the former Minister of Transport Jörg Leichtfried. He sees no added value or advantage in the pilot project and clearly indicates : "At 140 km, 20% of pollutant emissions 130 Compared to emissions at 100 km / h, emissions even increase by 50%."
According to Leichtfried, "total nonsense" is the time-saving argument: "Fast driving saves little time.In return, you and other road users face a great deal of risk. larger accident. "
The accelerated expansion of public service makes sense
"With more gas on the highway, traffic problems are certainly not to be solved.If the minister should speed up something, then the Öffi-expansion," commented the spokesman of the High -Green Austria, Severin Mayr the announcement.
"In his report on air quality in Upper Austria, the Court of Auditors asks that the air 100 on the A1 be really respected.The Minister of Transport does a few kilometers further west a test track at 140 km / h, it's strange, it also likes bad air, emissions and people's health, "says Mayr.
Tempo 140 brings additional emissions and requires additional climate investments
140 km on highways: "Minister Hofer seems convinced that he will implement his plans for Tempo 140 even before the start of his pilot project to investigate the quality of the air, the noise and accidents. It has nothing to do with evidence-based policies. At present, a sustainable policy in the interest of environmental protection is essential – but the government is taking the opposite approach.
After all, Austria was aware of the implementation of the international climate goals and promised a climate and energy strategy. Bernhard now sees him at risk: "Implementation of the agreement will cost tremendous effort anyway. Moving an additional burden and increasing greenhouse gas emissions to make populist policies will make achieving goals very difficult. Failure to comply with the agreement will hurt people and the climate, and will cost the citizens millions of dollars in taxes. "
Article published online by: / holler /
Source link
