[ad_1]
Pixel fans still have a long way to go before the launch of Pixel 4, but there are many reasons to be excited about Google's flagship product of the next generation, considering all the recent leaks. The phone should feature a perforated screen like the Galaxy S10, as well as a multi-lens camera that will look like the camera module of the iPhone 11, at least considering what the iPhone 11 has to say. This is not the first time that Google will copy the changes made by Apple, although in this case, it is more difficult to draw a clear conclusion, because the two companies may have worked simultaneously on the same design of reversing camera – others have already achieved the same result. Camera design last year, even though the module was placed in the middle. But Pixel 4 proves that Google is still deceived about the Pixel.
Remember the first generation Pixel phones, which looked a lot like iPhones? At the time, Google gave a lot of importance to the phone with a headphone jack. Well, guess what, a year later, Google had to pretend never to make fun of Apple while it was "killing" the audio port by itself. At the time, Google confirmed what we all suspected was that removing the 3.5mm connector would make it easy to design all-screen phones.
When Pixel 3 arrived last year, Google aligned itself with the long list of Android device makers who copied the iPhone X notch, at least regarding the Pixel 3 XL. This notch is hideous compared to other notches and the classic design of Pixel 3 is absolutely appalling by 2018.
Wireless charging was also a problem for Google when it came to Pixel hardware, bringing this feature to Pixel 3 a year after Apple's integration with iPhone X and iPhone 8 series phones. Yes, Android phones were supported without charge. thread well before the iPhone, and previous Google Nexus family phones also supported this feature. But the first two Pixel phones did not have it.
Even more interesting, Google last year insisted that only one back-up camera would be enough to provide pictures that are as good (or better) than images taken with competitive double or triple-shot shooters. Critics who followed showed that Google's unique lens configuration is excellent, with superb low-light photography powers. But this single-lens camera won no DxOMark recognition in Google, which Google has made clear to mention with the previous generation Pixel phones. The most confusing thing about Pixel 3 is that Google has virtually declared to the world that one camera can get awesome pictures, but you need two cameras in the front of the same phone to get better pictures selfies. This second lens is a super wide angle lens, which means that more people and objects will appear in your selfies.
This brings us to Pixel 4 (rendered above), which could make the jump to three cameras at the back, if the rendering we just saw is correct, which is a massive jump. It seems that Google is still wrong. A single-lens camera is not suitable for all phones with two, three, four or five cameras, not because it may not produce great pictures, but because it is extremely difficult to market it. Just keeping a camera on the back of a flagship device in a world where even the midrange handsets have at least two cameras on the back will not be an easy thing to defend, whatever the performance of this camera.
If you add all the problems that Pixel phones have faced in their brief history, that it's about performance issues, manufacturing flaws, screen quality, and the fact that it's all over the world. unable to produce a device that users want to buy, you get the same image. . Google, involved in making smartphones since its partnership with HTC on this Google Nexus One, has not learned to make phones that people want to buy. And the sales were not as brilliant as you'd expect for this particular series.
Maybe Pixel 4 will be different. Maybe the phone, which could look like a combination between the Galaxy S10 and the iPhone 11, will truly be the best Pixel phone ever made, a device that could help Google finally take an initiative and take more of risks in the smartphone business, and get away from the shadow of the iPhone.
Source of image: Zach Epstein, BGR
[ad_2]
Source link