[ad_1]
Monday, 6:10 am in Kansas City released a fuller audio version, first obtained and reported by KCTV-5, in which the Chiefs Tyreek Hill demodulator could be heard, telling his fiancée, Crystal Espinal: "You have to also be terrified, the audio extended, to my ears, was not worthy of interest. It looked a lot like the same thing: Espinal confronts Hill, claiming he's hurt her, along with her son, and Hill deflects him or denies him. Hill also denied any violence through his lawyer.
Although it is just more painful details above all the other terrible details already public, many writers seemed to have the impression of not being able to ignore the recording. The old adage, a good one, is led with the news. But what do you do when there is not much new?
You can complete your stories with a background. At this point, there is enough background on the Hill case. But the headlines differ and, by their very function, they require new information. So, even though Hill has already and repeatedly denied violence, you end up with headlines like these: "In a recorded conversation, Tyreek Hill denies the 2014 assault he pleaded guilty to" on ProFootballTalk ; "Tyreek Hill denies having harmed a girlfriend during a domestic violence incident in 2014: 610 audio recordings", on the Kansas City StarThe website of "Tyreek Hill Denies 2014 Dom. Violence in New Audio … "I did not touch you." On TMZ; "In Full Audio, Chiefs Hill denies attacking his fiancée" on ESPN; Tyreek Hill denies the assault of 2014 in a new audio recording: "F – The King has ruined my life" on the New York PostThe website of, and "Tyreek Hill of Chiefs, denies having abused her son and fiancee in a new extended audio recording," in Bleacher Report.
(It is interesting to note that in many publications, journalists do not write their own titles, so it's not fair to think that dubbed authors are responsible for them.) They are just as likely to be written by an editor, copy editor.)
Is the denial topical? No. Earlier this year, an investigation was opened into the possible abuse of the couple's young son. He is no longer in business, Kansas City area attorneys are convinced that they can not definitively prove which parent hurt the boy. Hill's lawyer denied any violence during each investigation. One could also hear Hill saying "I did not do anything, it's sad my brother" in the audio recordings released by KCTV in April, as well as Espinal pushing him away and saying that Hill had once hit the house. child in the chest. Hill deny having hurt his son is not new.
Then there is the question of the facts of a previous domestic violence case, for which Hill also spends some time on the band saying it is a lie. In this 2014 case, Hill was charged with domestic strangulation for allegedly choking and slapping a pregnant Espinal. He pleaded guilty to spousal abuse, but his sentence of imprisonment was deferred in consideration for his participation in an anger management course, a program of intervention for evildoers, his registration at school or his full time job. He also signed a statement in which he claimed to have put Espinal in a dead end. In open court, the day he agreed to plead, Hill told the judge, "I did something that I should not have done. I let my feelings take care of me. His lawyer, quoted in the report Oklahomanotsaid Hill "took responsibility, he said he was sorry, he is ready for this unfortunate situation to be behind him, to continue his life and to begin the next chapter." L & # 39; case was filed in 2018. If Hill was forced in any way to plead guilty to a crime that he claims not to have committed, he never said publicly.
But the titles themselves also end up extracting a lot of important context from the conversation. Here is how the conversation takes place in audio.
Hill: "This 2014 (bleep)? This (beep) is old. O.D. That's a lot too. On me, it's a lot. "
Espinal: "But you're sitting here and call me a bitch and all the rest …"
Hill: "But that's what you are, brother. You ruined my life when you lied to me in 2014. I'm still not above that.
Espinal: "How did I lie about …"
Hill: "Because I do not touch you in 2014. And I can put that on everything I love, my brother. This is the true truth.
Espinal: "OK, then saying you're going to take, having (penned) the guard of (pimped) that it's not going to do …"
Hill: "It's the real truth."
The conversation stops for them to talk to the people at the airport where they are going. Any discussion on 2014 resumes later with Hill.
Hill: "I'm really crazy, brother, because you ruined my life when you lied to me in 2014, little brother. And if you want to rewind that night, we can also rewind that night (pager) You were in my home, and did I take it and slammed it? Surely not. I took you and knocked on my door and after you left. And on my son, you did that, man. And then, when you arrive in the courtroom, you want to sit and cry (ring) on the stand: "He hit me," dude. Come on, brother.
Espinal: "So where do the bruises come from, Tyreek?"
Hill: "Did I hit you?"
Espinal: "Where do the bruises come from?"
Hill: "Did I hit, though?"
Espinal: "I'm asking where bruises come from?"
Hill: "I hit you? I hit you, though? I hit you? Tell the truth. Tell me the truth in my eyes now.
Espinal: "You do not think about …"
Hill: "Look at me, look at me."
[In the audio, Hill goes on to challenge every detail Espinal recalls about that night—from what they were doing, to why they fought, to if they saw a movie—repeatedly talking over her. The conversation shifts, then comes back to the topic.]
Hill: "… Then I'll put you out."
Espinal: "No, you asked me about it. You were like why this person, duh duh duh duh.
Hill: "Have I ever hit you? Have I ever hit the face, lip? Have I ever? No, I did not do it. "
Espinal: "You had your hand around my neck."
Hill: "No I do not, my brother. No, I did not do it. And this is the saddest part. That we. No. Now, I want you to sit on that flight and think about it that night. How about that? Because you want to bring something.
Espinal: "D & # 39; AGREEMENT."
Hill does not mention in the audio that he was accused of having strangled Espinal, who does not hit a person. Susan B. Sorenson, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and director of the Ortner Center on Family Violence, told Jezebel last year that throttling was a "particularly pernicious form of intimate partner violence." ", Adding later that" it was a form of abuse that can be used repeatedly, often with impunity. " Again, because it is difficult to document injuries. "
The audio has already launched a new series of sports talks about what Hill did and did not do; the station that published the audio devoted 25 minutes on this subject, repeating every word, stating theories that start with "what I believe that happened", and weighing those that they wanted to believe. A league source has already told ESPN that the NFL investigators had the audio track and "reflected it in their discussions of a potential discipline for Hill". to stay with Hill's leadership on the band – already in full force even if there is nothing new on the tape, except to hear more denials from a man who has already denial.
Neither you, nor I, nor any sports talk radio host will ever know exactly what happened between Hill, Espinal and their young son. The NFL either, although this does not prevent the league from acting as a judge and jury. But journalists and fans have not learned anything really new with this latest sound. What they should remember is that no matter the circumstances, denial does not mean absolution.
[ad_2]
Source link