The Rangers do not exclude Mike's minor trade



[ad_1]

Rangers president of baseball operations, Jon Daniels, said today that he was not willing to rule out a job as a better starter Mike Minor, as TR Sullivan of MLB.com was among those to cover on Twitter.

While Daniels also said he was not particularly inclined to move the organization's best pitcher, it's remarkable that he's taking an equally open stance on the subject at this point in the season. Just over two weeks before the trade deadline, the Rangers still have only 2.5 games to play. Although the division's eight-game gap is unlikely to be filled, it's not inconceivable that the Texan club will be within reach at the end of the month.

All things considered, this is a practical and realistic position for the Rangers' main baseball decision maker. When he addressed the club's position a month ago, Daniels said he intended to "stay true to his goal of balance, to remain a priority for the next few years". ranking, he added, explaining: "Overall, we know in which direction we are going."

For an organization that wants to fill up with young talent while remaining competitive in the short term, this season has been a bit dreamy. Not only has the club achieved several (but not all) investments as an independent agent and has seen the progress of some young key players (but not all), but it's also positioned for a legitimate race in series.

As for Minor … he is somewhere in the middle on all fronts. Signed for a three-year contract before the 2018 season, he exceeded all expectations. His $ 9.5 million salary this year and next year seems like a bargain now that Minor has 117 innings of 2.54 ERAs on the season. Although the Rangers wish to continue to take advantage of Minor's presence at the top of a rotation that still raises many questions, the chances of making money are obviously also appealing.

There is of course another possibility: an extension. But Minor is 31 years old and has a history of arm diseases. There is no guarantee that he will be able to settle a new contract, but the Rangers may need to be cautious about having a contract with a clear value proposition. At this point, it seems difficult to consider the possibility of an extension as an important factor.

In the end, Daniels indicates more than he is willing to listen to the offers rather than getting ready to shop for the veteran southpaw. There is a noticeable difference, at least in theory. But the key question will arise at the time of the decision. Will the Texan organization rely on a high asking price or will it finally make the best reasonable offer it can obtain?

[ad_2]

Source link