The shadow of Bryan Singer loomed above the Oscars last night, showing that Hollywood had not changed



[ad_1]

TThe 91st Academy Awards lacked a host, a theme, a favorite, or even a fandom motivated enough to convince anyone that the Oscars posed real issues. Still, he managed to stumble on stage.

But if the simulacrum of celebration made a thing perfectly clear, it was that the hour would certainly not be better.

Harvey Weinstein and some of his team may have fled the Hollywood courthouse, but the empire of rape, shame, and exploitation that he and his others built in the hills still ruled over the city. 'a golden night in fashion, corsair, cotton' and whimsical ploys to present a facade of vigil.

In the background, there was the simple fact that the entire evening had been produced by Donna Gigliotti, a former Weinstein journalist who had left Miramax only to return to the Weinstein Society. after she had received the complaints of the victims of the tycoon of the film. But in the foreground, just think of the elephant in the room: "Bohemian Rhapsody", the lyrical and whitewashed biopic of Freddy Mercury, directed by serial sexual predator Bryan Singer.

To call Singer's reign of terror an open secret would not be an understatement; it would be just a lie. Singer, one of the most prolific (read: profitable) filmmakers of our generation, is the subject of civil lawsuits for sexual assault and pedophilia for decades. In 1997, a child actor sued Singer for orchestrating a group scene for the film "Apt Pupil". Documentary filmmakers and journalists spent 20 years trying to tell the story of boys alleging that Singer had raped them, and lawsuits continued without praise. Singer then directed a multitude of "X-Men" movies, "Superman Returns", "Jack the Giant Slayer" and, of course, "Bohemian Rhapsody".

On October 5, 2017, Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey dropped the story that rocked the first domino on Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein's entire life. After two months and more than four months of activity in the main movie "Bohemian Rhapsody", Singer abandoned the ship, citing his mother's alleged illness as an excuse for 20th Century Fox to end his contract at during the last weeks of filming. as an "unfortunate situation".

No matter the blinding glare of the silver screen frames, Singer's body count casts a shadow as heavy as a mountain on the undeserved victories of "Bohemian Rhapsody". Cynics among us might consider these victories as a sign of the hat to Hollywood rapey manners.

Of course, the Academy kept the radio silent on the director of the biopic, but voters were more than happy to give John Ottman the prize for best editing, the same John Ottman who had mounted "Apt Pupil" and dozens of other films made or produced by Singer.

"Bohemian Rhapsody" finally won four of the five Oscars for which he was nominated. Not a winner, presenter, or even a reserve commentator has recognized the mere fact that Singer's name was still inscribed on the film by the directors' guild of directors. The final price of the film was the announcement of Rami Malek, who won the award for best actor for the cosplay of rock legend. As he did with all the honors won this season of awards, Malek conveniently ignored the existence of Singer, who realized the overwhelming majority of the film that propelled him to the movie theater.

Unlike Ottman, who has spent decades working with Singer, Malek may have an air of plausible denial. But since the platform condemned Singer's criminal behavior as well as the cabal of the industry that allowed him for years, Malek was sticking to the script.

As if by pure luck, karma began. Malek did not just leave the scene once he accepted his statue. Instead, he stepped out of the scene, leaving "Green Book" to accept his well-awarded Best Film Award and bring the Oscars to its pitiful end.

[ad_2]

Source link