[ad_1]
Tillis wrote that, while promoting security at the border, he feared that the President had spread too much with the declaration of national emergency.
"As a US Senator, I can not justify giving the executive more ways to bypass Congress," he wrote. "As a Conservative, I can not subscribe to a precedent that I know future left-wing presidents will exploit to advance radical policies that will erode economic and individual freedoms."
Tillis argued that the vote on the resolution should not be a matter of support for the president and border security. Instead, he said, it's a matter of separation of powers, and he warned Republicans not to "look away" because the same tactic could be used by a democratic president in the future.
He likened his opposition to the national emergency to his opposition to the executive action of President Barack Obama creating the Deferred Action program for child arrivals.
"There is no intellectual honesty in turning around and asserting that there is an imaginary asterisk associated with the excessive dominance of executive power – that it is acceptable for my party but not for your party, "wrote Tillis.
[ad_2]
Source link