U.S. Supreme Court releases December pleading schedule – Ballotpedia News

by



[ad_1]

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) released on September 20 the December pleadings schedule for the mandate 2021-2022, by programming nine cases of argumentation. The court will hear nine hours of oral argument between November 29 and December 8.

Click on the links below to learn more about the cases:

29 november

  1. Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation concerns the administrative state and concerns the question of whether aadministrative agency can issue ato reign on the basis of an interpretation of a law that a federal court concluded was not subject to interpretation.

November 30

  1. Cummings v. First Rehab concerns federal disability laws and whether they allow the claimant to obtain compensatory damages for emotional distress.
  2. American Hospital Association v. Becerra concerns the administrative state and implies that theChevron respect the doctrine allows theUS Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reduce the reimbursement rate the agency pays to certain hospitals for the treatment of Medicare patients.

1st December

  1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization concerns a direct challenge to the Supreme Court’s rulings in Roe vs. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) and the constitutionality of a Mississippi state law prohibiting abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy except in cases of medical emergency or fetal abnormalities.

December 6

  1. Patel vs. Garland concerns the jurisdiction of federal courts to hear appeals in immigration proceedings specifically related to judgments allowing adjustment of immigration status from nonimmigrant to permanent resident.
  2. Hughes v. Northwestern University concerns defined contribution pension schemes of the Employees Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (ERISA).

December 7

  1. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Doe concerns complaints of discrimination on the basis of disability under the Rehabilitation and Affordable Care Acts.
  2. United States v. Taylor concerns theHobbs Law and the definition of a crime of violence under the law.

December 8

  1. Carson vs. Makin concerns the funding of public education, religious education and the Supreme Court ruling inEspinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020).

To date, the court has granted review in 34 cases during the next term. Five cases have not yet been scheduled for oral argument. Two cases were rejected after being accepted.

Further reading:

[ad_2]

Source link