[ad_1]
After several years with Sony in the mirrorless world, Canon and Nikon have finally announced their full-frame mirrorless cameras. The initial feeling may not be brilliant for Canon and Nikon; However, I think Canon did something absolutely amazing.
In a previous article, I discussed what I thought Canon needed to do to succeed in the mirrorless market. In the true form of Canon, they did nothing that I asked and opted for something completely different, but still great. The EOS R is a full-frame mirrorless camera with the same sensor as the 5D Mark IV, but at a much lower price. It sounds good to me already, but before talking about all the good things, let's first discuss what happened to them first.
Single card slot
Canon, the proverbial brick wall. This problem was negated, and yet, Canon thought that it was ok to take out a mirrorless camera with only one card slot. I know that some of you may need to discuss why it does not matter, why professionals can still work with, and so on. It boils down to one thing: two card slots are better than one and Canon has had every opportunity to offer this feature. In addition, this is an SD card slot, which means that they have enough space to offer another, but have intentionally chosen not to. Nikon can somehow get away with his slightly weak excuse for not having enough space due to the use of an XQD card, but how does Canon justify it? -he? I mean, even Fujifilm with their relatively small cameras offer two card slots. The fact is that I will not buy this individual camera just because Canon could not bother adding an extra SD card slot.
Video functions
Regarding the video, the 5D Mark IV was rather disappointing because of the large size factor and the odd file type. The EOS R corrects one of these problems by supporting a more useful codec. however, the culture factor remains. The cropping factor in this camera means that you lose about 75% of your viewing angle. A 24mm lens will have an angle of view similar to that of a 40mm lens, making the wide-angle shots and potentially vlogues a little complicated. Yes, Canon offers an adapter on which you can use EF-S lenses such as 10-18 mm; However, in my opinion, this objective is not very efficient and there is currently no native lens. The fact that this has the same harvesting factor as the 5D Mark IV means that it is laziness of Canon. Sony and Nikon have a major advantage in this area because of the harvest factor, and Canon has, in my opinion, made a serious mistake with this decision.
Canon also decided not to include image stabilization in its device, but this was rather expected given Canon's position on this feature. Now that we have this irrelevant, let's talk about things that fascinate me.
Lens selection
Ok seriously, talk about getting him out of the park. These initial goals announced by Canon with the EOS R are simply staggering. I am still dealing with the fact that there is a RF 28-70mm f / 2L. It is the widest full-frame zoom lens on the market with a complete shutdown. Yes, I know, the Sigma 24-35mm f / 2, but go, this lens has two focal lengths. I am delighted that Canon has not tried to make small, small aperture lenses. In stark contrast, Nikon has the poorest lens range compared to a long shot: f / 1.8 expensive and relatively boring lenses and a 24-70 f / 4 lens. Native lenses available immediately from Nikon are really not inspiring. Some of you may be tempted to bring the 58mm f / 0.95, but let's be honest for a moment. This lens is nothing more than a coat room ornament, a super expensive and inconvenient lens that most of us will never buy or even be able to not used. Canon, meanwhile, has released some very interesting and practical lenses like the RF 50mm f / 1.2L. This large aperture and autofocus lens is available for pre-order as soon as EOS R is available. Even Sony has nothing like it in their system, and it's been a while already. To top it off, Canon has also announced the RF 24-105mm f / 4.0L, a more affordable and useful lens. The DSLR version of this lens has proven to be extremely popular, and this goal will more than likely continue in this light. To add to that, the control rings on these lenses are going to be a very useful feature and can function as an electronic aperture ring.
If there is one thing that Canon always seems to be right, it's their goals, and as usual, they do not disappoint. Whatever complaints you may have about this Canon camera, the lenses are superb. In the end, the lenses make a lot more difference than virtually any other feature of today's cameras. Canon, as usual, always offers the best and most interesting range of lenses. Honestly, I can not wait for Canon to release a high resolution mirrorless option (with two card slots) because I would like to own those lenses.
Adapters
I know I complained about the potential of an adapter and I talked at length about how Canon should stick to the EF mount. I'm so happy to be wrong, because Canon did something very special with its adapters. Based on some of the initial criticisms, it seems that Canon's adapters work very well, if not more or less like native lenses. Apart from that, Canon has used the distance of the flange to allow awesome things like deposit filters. No other major manufacturer currently offers this feature and Canon is really outdone with this one. Having built-in filters means less hacking at the front, and every lens you fit can use the filters. If you use circular filters with your lenses, you'll know that different filter wire sizes mean you have to buy a lot of different filter sizes. The alternative is to use square filters, and this type of system is less effective in many shooting scenarios, especially if you hold hands. A filter built into your adapter and all your adapted lenses have a polarizer or ND.
As an architecture photographer, I can not tell you how bad I think it is. In fact, all my lenses, including lenses such as the 17mm f / 4L TS-E, can use ND or CPL filters. I can see this extremely useful for landscape photographers and even portraits. Canon has also announced an adapter containing a control ring. This control ring can be programmed to do a number of features, but I think it's better to use it as an opening ring. As for the adapters, Canon has done something much better than anything I thought and I'm looking forward to moving to their mirrorless system.
Last thoughts
I understand that a number of people are disappointed by the current camera; However, if we look at this as a system, there is a lot to do. Even the actual camera will probably be a fantastic option for many photographers. This camera contains the same sensor as the 5D Mark IV, which means that at this price level, it's the highest resolution you can buy. The only real thing that Canon managed to do with this camera was the single card slot. This is the first camera announced by Canon for its full-frame mirrorless system, and its price is not the same as that of its top-level cameras. We can assume that when Canon announces a camera capable of competing with the Nikon Z7, it will probably have two card slots and perhaps other features to seduce its customers. Although I do not personally buy this device, I can imagine that it is the best seller because it offers very interesting features. In the end, in the long run, I think Canon has big benefits with its mirrorless system as a whole.
Tell me what you think and what you think Canon should offer in the new EOS R cameras.
Direct the image of freestocks.org on Unsplash, used under Creative Commons.
[ad_2]
Source link
