[ad_1]
Google has finally unveiled the new Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL earlier this week, ending leaks and rumors that have been flooding the Web for months. For reasons we have already dealt with a dozen times (an expedition of prototypes of Pixel 3 XL would have been stolen and sold on the black market), we had the impression of knowing everything about the third generation Pixel phones of the society. well before their appearance on stage in New York last Tuesday. Of course, leaks never give a complete picture and we learned a lot of new and interesting details during the Google press conference. It is not surprising that many of these details are for Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL cameras.
Besides the fact that Google's Pixel phones are getting instant access to newer versions of Android while rival phone owners have to wait several months before receiving updates, the Pixel's range of phone phones Google are among the main attractions of these phones. In fact, last year's Pixel 2 is still considered by some to be the best camera phone available today. This will certainly change next week with the release of the Pixels 3 and 3 XL, but can a single-lens camera really surpass the dual and triple-lens cameras of other recent flagship smartphones?
Reviewers will likely spend a lot of time opposing the new Pixel 3 camera to other leading camera phones. While waiting for these in-depth comparisons, there are already some interesting pieces that have been spreading since Google's press conference last week. Google has announced some very interesting new software features that will help further enhance the camera experience on the Pixel 3 and 3 XL, and one in particular has been tested earlier this week.
Google's decision to keep a single-lens camera on the back of its new third-generation Pixel phones has been much appreciated. This is a particularly topical subject, considering that Google has added a dual lens camera to the front of both phones. Of course, the company fully explained the logic behind its decision during the event. The selfie dual lens camera exists only to facilitate wide angle selfies that fit more into the frame. Since rear-facing cameras are generally used to photograph far more distant subjects, the problem is less serious.
Google has managed to use software tips to compensate for all features enabled by dual lens cameras on other phones. Of course, the question is how do these software tips work? We've already seen that portrait shots taken with single-lens cameras can be quite impressive, and Google's new "Super Res Zoom" feature on Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL has been tested. .
Optical zoom is one of the advantages of pairing a telephoto lens with a standard wide-angle lens. However, Google does not have a dual lens camera on the back of its new phones. As a result, the company's engineers created an enhanced digital zoom function to provide zoomed photos as sharp as the captured photos using optical zoom. Super Res Zoom is it efficient? Maybe not.
Via Reddit, we are headed to a quick test that has been posted on Twitter by a blogger the day after Google's Pixel 3 event. The test could not have been simpler. He took the same picture with a Pixel 3 and an iPhone XS while both phones were zoomed to 2x. Apple's iPhone XS has a secondary telephoto lens; so it uses an optical zoom up to 2x, while the Pixel 3 uses the digital zoom. The image below shows the result of the iPhone XS on the left and the result of the pixel 3 on the right.
You can see the high-resolution versions of the images here, but you probably will not need them because the results could not be clearer. The Google Super Zoom resolution is certainly impressive, but the clarity of the photo can not even match that taken with the optical zoom of the iPhone XS. We will add that the color reproduction and the tone are also much better on the picture of the iPhone XS.
Of course, this is not an in-depth comparison and we still have no idea of the correspondence between Google's new Pixel 3 camera and the entire iPhone XS. What we can say, however, is that Google's improved digital zoom is impressive, but it already seems clear that it can not be compared to the actual optical zoom.
Source of image: Zach Epstein, BGR
[ad_2]
Source link
