[ad_1]
By Roger Fingas
Friday, September 28, 2018 at 07:44 am, Pacific time (10:44 am ET)
A US federal court of appeal on Friday awarded Apple the $ 234 million layoff demand for damages previously won by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation for violating a transformer patent.
Based on the evidence presented during the liability phase of a 2015 trial, no reasonable juror could have found an offense, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal having ruled in accordance with Reuters. The court added that Apple deserved a judgment in law and that no reasonable juror could have made his decision.
The lawsuit filed by WARF goes back to the beginning of the year 2014. In its filing, Apple would have deliberately violated a patented microarchitecture architecture with its A7, A8 and A8X system-on-chip designs used in the iPhone and iPad.
Specifically, Apple allegedly violated the WARF patent on speculative processing, in which a predictor circuit begins executing expected instructions based on previous instructions given to the processor.
The attorneys argued that Apple had not only violated the speculative treatment patent relating to chip development, but had also cited it in its own patent filings, and in addition to that, refused to apply for an intellectual property license.
The initial decision of $ 234.2 million was made in October 2015 and was less than the $ 400 million that FROA sought in its trial.
In 2017, a US District Court Judge raised damages to $ 506 million, saying Apple continued to use unlicensed patented technology.
WARF had previously used this patent, No. 5,781,752, to force Intel to enter into an agreement in 2008, claiming that the chip manufacturer's Core 2 Duo processor had infringed claims identical to those against Apple.
Apple has continuously denied any violation in court proceedings. The company also sought to mark the IP as invalid and requested a review of the validity of the USPTO, but the patent body refused to take such action.
A second WARF case involving new processors designed by Apple is still in the process of being approved. The judge who made the $ 506-million decision does not make a decision until the end of the appeal process.
[ad_2]
Source link
