[ad_1]
If there is a way to fix the Malay era, it is with the modern force. And we are inclined to believe that Chevy's latestborn is really muscular. In fact, the menacing killer you see in the photo is equipped with the type of brute force usually reserved for high-speed trains: a couple of 755bhp and 715lb foot.
Yes, it's the car equivalent of a man crushing his empty Miller Lites against his forehead, be it glass bottles. And this is just one of the three muscular machines built by Chevrolet (although, oddly enough, it's the only one they've photographed) to present its new line of extremely powerful cash-engine engines before the SEMA show in November . There will be a pair of trucks on the stand showing variations on the theme "Chevy V8 swap or GTFO", but we are resolutely interested in the Chevelle.
In 1973, the Laguna Chevelle was delivered as standard with a 5.7 liter V8, capable of producing an incredible 145bhp. If that was important to you, you can choose a carburettor version with 175 barrels of four barrels, or skip any economic pretext and offer you a big V8 of 7.4 liters with a power of 245 hp. Ah, the 1970s: when there really was no replacement for moving. And when the synthetic velvet was a fabric quite suitable for a nightclub.
This frankly absurd 755bhp from the 1973 Chevrolet Laguna is offered by the 6.2L V8 LT5. As Chevrolet fans will tell you, his other home is under the hood of the Corvette ZR1.
In reality, it is difficult to design a more American engine: eight cylinders, each with more interior space than a bottle of wine, arranged in V and powered by a compressor larger than most engines. The LT5 has a direct injection and a direct injection, because 755 horses are not going to magize the full whip.
Yes, it's terrible for the environment and yes, it's one of the worst times of American cars and … it's useless. We want that, badly. We want this car, from its flanks in red letters to its naughty black-on-black color scheme. And maybe more, we want the culture that created it because of adherence to a simple mantra: driving a car can be really, really fun, so why not make sure that's the case ?
That's the kind of thing you can not imagine in such a serious and openly serious environment: builders sell their engines directly to bettors, to be able to demolish old cars and massage an engine about six times more powerful. than is strictly necessary. Why? Well, why not?
Source link
