Chrome 70 will clarify controversial and confusing connection changes



[ad_1]

For the most part, Chrome 69 is an important release, bringing a new hardware design, a smarter search bar, and so on. But thanks to a little advertised feature, it has turned into a mess. Contrary to its stated purpose, the new registration consistency has brought only more confusion and the usual monopolistic accusations. Now Google is asking Chrome users to stay cool and navigate, because Chrome 70 will address these issues, not fix them.

The new feature seemed pretty simple. When you've signed in to a Google service using a Chrome browser, you're also signed in to this Chrome browser with that same Google Account. Log out of the Chrome browser or Google service and you will be automatically logged out. Google's goal was to reduce the confusion of creating two separate connections and reduce the risk of creating a Google search (tracked) using your account when signing in to a Chrome account. other account.

Except that it's been a long time since Chrome users are used to it. This only makes it more confusing and, considering that it is not a widely publicized change, it may be more problematic. In the extreme, some have accused Google of turning the Chrome browser into a simple gateway for Google services and encouraging users to unintentionally share their browsing history with Google, even if they are n & # 39; 39, were connected only to Gmail.

Google states that the new Chrome login feature does not automatically enable Chrome syncing, which means that browsing history, cookies, passwords and other items are not detected suddenly. Users must explicitly enable the password if they wish. And from Chrome 70, users will have the option to disable this link. The user interface will also be designed to reflect the confusing duality of connections and synchronization.

Obviously, Google does not back down from its position, but it could have saved itself a bit of head if it had been more aware of the feature. Again, he would still have been criticized for this, as critics do independently.

[ad_2]
Source link