[ad_1]
Apple's fortune is entirely related to the iPhone is over. Between iPad, Mac, HomePod, Apple TV and Apple Watches, not to mention a fast-growing service business, Apple's most famous product is not necessarily the only one that counts.
But it's still the most important product in Apple's entire portfolio. It has the greatest cultural significance, the greatest reach, the greatest cachet, and is for most people the point of entry into the very important Apple ecosystem.
The iPhone XS was a predictable phone model "S", incorporating the main features of design and operation from the previous year and improving the performance and quality of the camera. Let's hope that for 2019, Apple goes further. Here's what to expect for the iPhone 2019 model.
Note that general software enhancements are not included here. All software that is not specifically related to new hardware is covered by an iOS 13 wish list.
An even more powerful neural engine
In 2019, the iPhone will probably have a new A-series processor, which Apple will probably call the A13 (if not superstitious). Apple's manufacturing partners will certainly not be ready with the new 5-nm manufacturing process for next year's iPhone – TSMC plans to manufacture 5-nm chips for partners like Apple in 2020.
AppleApple's Neural Engine got a lot more powerful in the A12. I think the A13 should focus again.
This means another chip built on the same 7 nm process. We probably can not expect huge advances in performance and battery life, but Apple will likely continue to increase the number of transistors and provide us with a larger, more powerful chip.
Hopefully, as it did with the A12, Apple will give the Neural engine the lion's share of second-generation real estate. This is the part of the chip specializing in the processing of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms, which is becoming more and more part of everything Apple does. It's a big part of Siri, the camera app, the Photos app, augmented reality, and more. Developers can use CoreML to target the neural engine and run their own machine learning code faster.
Let's see an A13 with double the neural engine performance of the A12. Go from 5 trillion operations per second to 10 trillion. The processor and graphics processor are already much faster than the competition, they do not need to be boosted. But while AI and machine learning become more and more the heart of iOS, its applications and its services, accelerating the neural engine can have a huge impact.
A crazy camera
Every iPhone has a better camera than the previous one. This is true since the very first model and it will not stop anytime soon.
But it's time for Apple to do more than just enhance image processing. A third lens on the back, perhaps a wide-angle shooter, could offer exciting new digital photography options in addition to simply offering iPhone users another way to take pictures.
IDGIs it time to place a third camera at the back? Or maybe a second wide angle selfie camera?
An additional wide-angle front camera could be even more useful: it's by taking selfies that people seem to have the most difficulty getting everything they want in the frame.
But beyond the new hardware, Apple really has to stall new software photography features. Google's new Night Sight mode is a good example of the kind of semi-experimental functionality that iPhone users would like to play. Nvidia's technology for generating slow-motion images from ordinary images is the kind of feature that would perfectly match the powerful Neural Engine engine of the latest Apple chips.
Of course, regular snapshots should look better, but we should be able to do more. The iPhone must be able to allow us to take pictures like never before.
A second-generation TrueDepth module
On the iPhone XS, the facial identity is faster than on iPhone X. This is mainly due to the improved speed of the secure enclave and the Neural Engine. The TrueDepth module itself has not really been improved.
Christopher Hebert / IDGThe facial identity is excellent, but a second generation TrueDepth module could bring it to the next level.
I would like to see a second generation TrueDepth hardware module. It's probably too much to hope that it magically shrinks to the size that the small cache of the iPhone X without snapping could contain, but it could work better with its current size. This should work with your phone turned in any orientation, like on the new iPad Pro. It should be more reliable in more lighting conditions, including in cases where a bright light is behind you (using Face ID with the passing of the midday sun can sometimes be a challenge). The angle of view should be a little wider, so the phone rests on the desk next to you.
We can all remember how Touch ID improved when the iPhone 6s introduced a second generation module. Imagine this qualitative leap, the "magic" feeling that applies to the application of Face ID.
Switch to USB-C
Macs recharge via USB-C, iPhones and iPad via Lightning.
But the new iPad Pro has switched to USB-C, which throws the entire division "USB-C for Mac and Lightning for iOS."
Christopher Hebert / IDGIt's time for Lightning to be replaced by USB-C. Tear off the dressing. This is the good thing for the future of the platform.
It's time to unify the system. Apple All-in with USB-C on Mac; he does not put all Other ports on Mac laptops and iMacs have many USB-C ports. Simplify everyone's lives and switch Lightning to USB-C on all iPhones and iPads. Give us a cable to govern them all.
Of course, it may be necessary that the iPhone is a tiny a little thicker to accommodate the port, but okay. This just gives way to Apple for …
A bigger battery
I never hear anyone complain that the iPhone is not thin enough. Or that other high-end phones, like the Galaxy S9 or the Pixel 3, are too thick. j & # 39; mean everyone complain about wanting more battery life.
IDGThe battery life of the iPhone is certainly not bad, but everyone still wants more. A larger battery is the easiest way to get there.
Here's the tone: make the new iPhone a millimeter thicker. It would take 8.7mm, less than half a millimeter thicker than the iPhone XR! It would still look ultra-premium, and you might even be able to get rid of the camera hump for an incredibly bright design.
This would leave room inside for a thicker battery and larger capacity, as well as for USB-C (as mentioned before). It's a win-win-win.
A quick charger in the box
Apple still ships a thousand dollar phones with a 5-watt charger in the box. Phones are able to charge much faster, but you'll never know if you're not buying another charging adapter.
Chongdiantou Rumors about a USB-C fast charge adapter in the iPhone case have not materialized this year.
Earlier this year, we heard several rumors that an 18-watt USB-C adapter would replace the built-in 5-watt adapter. Unfortunately, their veracity has not been proven.
It's time to put a USB-C fast charger in the box. This penny-pinching of the most successful technology company in the world, at the expense of the user experience, on some of the most expensive phones that money can buy, shameful.
A permanent display
Technically, Apple could add it to any phone with an OLED screen with iOS update, but it would not surprise me to see the company make it exclusive to a new model.
Showing the time, date and some other simple information that can be gleaned (such as weather and perhaps a number of unread messages) at any time on the screen could easily be accomplished with minimal power consumption.
It would be good if the fight also reduces the time spent in front of a screen. How often do we take our phone just to check the time, date or weather and let ourselves be dragged into a sea of notifications. If a glance at my desk could give me this information without even touching my phone, I would raise it less often and let myself be less distracted by the endless arguments on social networks.
Make the little one smaller
If Apple has to create three iPhone sizes again, it would not be a bad idea to reduce the smallest. Currently, the iPhone XS 5.8 inches does not really gratify the itch of those looking for a new iPhone SE. Some people are really connected to small phones, and although I do not think that Apple needs to specifically target this market with a four-inch model, a reduction to 5.2 inches or more would really make many of those small phone enthusiasts happy.
Yes, a smaller phone would have room for a smaller battery. But the display being smaller would help. And did I mention that the new iPhone should be thicker, to accommodate a bigger battery?
A price reduction
HA! Who are we kidding? At the time of the iPod, Apple was giving us more each year for less money. But the price of the iPhone seems only one way and the rising cost of Apple shows no sign of stopping.
A very good set of prices for new iPhones would be: $ 699 for the more affordable model (the successor of the iPhone XR), $ 849 for the successor of the iPhone XS and $ 949 for the successor of the iPhone XS Max.
These are always high-end phones, premium, but maybe a little easier to buy.
As Apple is almost certain to keep its exorbitant prices on the iPhone (if not increase them even higher), why not give us a little more value? Put the headset adapter back into the box, give us a USB-C fast charge adapter and maybe even increase the storage capacity of the base to 128 GB (at least on the more expensive models).
[ad_2]
Source link
