[ad_1]
A 3DMark FireStrike benchmark of NVIDIA's next GeForce GTX 1170 graphics card would have been released and it would show absolutely monstrous performance of the company's new GTX XX70 GPU.
Related NVIDIA "Turing" Next Generation 11 GPUs Generate Record TSMC Revenue Growth in the Fourth Quarter
A Few Years Ago more than two months, we had released the preliminary specifications NVIDIA's GTX 1170 performance was based on all rumors and contemporary leaks and we have qualified it as a potential killer of GTX 1080 Ti.If this recent leak is to believe, we are watching a GTX 1080 Ti killer. 19659006] The alleged GTX 1170 3DMark FireStrike benchmark, spotted on the Polish hardware forums
The GTX 1170 features a 256-bit memory interface coupled to 16GB of GDDR6 memory and will operate at a speed of up to 15,000. impressive clock of ~ 2.5 GHz, which is significantly higher than anything we saw on Pascal and Volta. The card would have reached 29752 graphics points in 3DMark FireStrike, ahead of NVIDIA's GTX 1080 Ti and significantly ahead of AMD's RX Vega 64. on these numbers, we are looking at a map that is no less than 65% faster than the GTX 1070, and as much as 38% faster than the GTX 1080.
Related NVIDIA and AMD graphics card Prices down to 18% all over the map
There are several red flags associated with this leak "presumed", and I say alleged because we are not entirely confident in this "leakage" to classify it s, at this point it is more than a rumor of where the etiquette of the rumor in this article.
The fact that what we are looking at is a photograph of a screen rather than a real screen capture or even better a 3DMark database entry makes this leak suspect " presumed "because it can be falsified. All that the "leaker" would have to do is take a screenshot of an ordinary 3DMark score, modify it with the details of the GTX 1170, display the modified image on the Screen and then take a picture. In fact, we have seen this exact method used in abundance to create fake leaks before.
The second red flag is the fact that we were unable to locate this 3DMark entry in the 3DMark database, although a careful tester could block 3DMark from creating an entry online this "presumed" leak photo shows a database entry rather than an offline 3DMark benchmark run. An entry that does not exist online as far as we can discern.
The third red flag is the fact that the entry displays the map as a GTX 1170, rather than an NVIDIA "generic VGA" entry as usual with the first graphics. card leaks. It is unlikely that 3DMark could properly identify a GTX 1170 as GTX 1170 before launching the card and it is much more likely that it simply reports it as a NVIDIA "generic VGA" card.
The fourth and last red flag is the clock speed. A ~ 2.5 GHz clock speed on these chips is very unlikely, largely because we are very likely talking about 12nm silicon and even a clock speed of 2 GHz ready for use. job would be optimistic.
At the end of the day we simply could not verify the authenticity of this leak and even though the level of performance that it reflects could very well be accurate, we urge the Readers take it with the usual grain of salt associated with unverified rumors, which with all this, we expect a lot of NVIDIA Turing GPUs and we would not be surprised if the next GTX 1170, or any other NVIDIA could l & # 39; 39, call, can provide class performance GTX 1080 Ti or close to him. We will know soon, next month at Gamescom, so stay tuned.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1170 Preliminary Specifications
Wccftech | GTX 1170 | GTX 1070 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Turing | Pascal | ||
Lithograph | 12nm FinFET | 16nm FinFET [19659025] GPU | GT104 | GP104 |
The Size | ~ 400mm² | 314mm² [19659035] CUDA Hearts | 2688 | 1920 |
TMUs | 168 | 120 | ||
ROPs | 64 | 64 | ||
Basic Clock | ~ 1500MHz | 1506MHz [19659047] Boost Clock | ~ 1800MHz | 1683MHz |
FP32 Performance | ~ 9.75 TFLOPS | 6.5 TFLOPS | ||
Memory Interface | 256-bit | 256-bit | ||
Memory | 8-16 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR5 | ||
Speed of memory [19659020] 12Gbps | 8Gbps | |||
Bandwidth of the memory | 384GB / s | 256GB / s | ||
TDP | 140-160W [19659021] 15 0 | |||
Launch | T3 (August) 2018 | June 10, 2016 | ||
Launched PDSF | ~ $ 499 | $ 379 $ 449 (Founder) |
Share
Tweet
] Submit