Which iPad should you buy? That's my advice to friends …



[ad_1]

Many friends have asked my opinion on which iPad to buy. In general, when I ask iDevices for advice, I start by asking a lot of questions instead. What will you use it for? How often will you carry it with you? How attractive are X, Y and Z features?

According to their answers, I've recommended everything from the cheapest model to the most expensive model. Indeed, my general advice with the iPad is that unless you need one of Pro's features, the cellular version of the 9.7-inch iPad with 128GB of storage is probably the best.

But this year is a little different …

NordVPN

This year, I said that if you can afford it, you'll never regret buying the new 12.9-inch model.

I was quick to fall in love.

Above all, I am absolutely amazed to have this size screen in such a small and lightweight device. I really did not really want to go back to the original model. I was completely in love with the size of the screen. But it was too big and heavy. This one is neither one nor the other. Even in the short time I've had to use so far today, the size and weight of my hands are already quite normal – but coupled with the breathtaking experience of this screen …

Indeed, I thought it was such a great device that it really highlighted the limitations of iOS for a device of this size.

Although the iPad Pro does not try to be a Mac, it is an adult device and it requires an adult operating system. Not macOS, but rather a customized version of iOS, designed to take advantage of the additional features of the iPad. What some people have called padOS.

This is what I consider the minimum acceptable specification for padOS – if you give me this information, I would be very happy:

  • A welcome screen with a totally flexible layout
  • Properly windowed applications
  • Supports a trackpad

In comments on this piece, some have argued that Apple was already doing enough: that there are already some features limited to the iPad. Others felt that Apple needed to go further, but that it was necessary to keep a blue water between the features of the iPad and the Mac. But the idea of ​​padOS has received considerable support.

When I tried the original 12.9-inch model, I had a hard time deciding which iPad to keep, but the daily porting and use of the eBook in bed were the deciding factors . However, the new model is ideal for both roles.

Indeed, even though I still appreciate the size of the screen, the screen does not look big. My partner uses my 9.7 inch iPad Pro (she did not want the 10.5 inches because it would have had to change the shell and lid), and it now looks tiny. It almost looks like an iPad mini.

And even my 10.5 inch model – sitting here, waiting for its new owner to pick it up – feels a bit cramped.

Of course, everything is relative. I had exactly the same experience when I went from the 9.7 inch model to the 10.5 inch model. The new one was very quickly felt normal, while the old one felt small. This is the reason why I really think that it is justified to propose even larger models.

But among the models currently available, the sweet-spot is for me the largest iPad. This is because portability does not really matter, unless it must contain a particular bag. All current models are sufficiently portable. And the benefits of a larger screen are so huge that I think you need a good reason for not choosing it.

The price could be this reason, of course. When the base model for 9.7-inch iPad costs $ 329 (often a lot less) and meets the needs of most consumers, you can state that you need a very good reason to spend a sum at four digits. But if you can easily afford one of the options, I do not think you'll ever regret going for 12.9 inches.

If you're still trying to decide for yourself which iPad to buy, my advice is to go to an Apple Store or another retailer where you can get acquainted with all models. Once you have done that, I would be very surprised if you do not sell on the 12.9 inch.


Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more information on Apple:

[ad_2]
Source link