[ad_1]
This is not normally considered a risky sport, since there is no physical contact.
But badminton players should always wear goggles because they could become blind, the researchers warned.
Flying shuttlecocks and sports rackets can cause injuries that require surgery and even blindness.
And those who play doubles are at a higher risk of serious eye injury than singles players, the experts said.
There are no rules imposing goggles, and professional players suggest that it is so because injuries are very rare.
Beijing researchers have warned that badminton players should always wear goggles because they could become blind.
Researchers at Capital Medical University in Beijing added that visually impaired people should not play at all.
Dr. Yi Liu, co-author of the study, said: "Wearing eye protection is highly recommended, based on the advice of expert professionals, safety education and the awareness of eye injuries that may occur.
"Over the last 40 years, it has been reported many times that none of the wounded were wearing goggles while playing badminton, and we are telling the same story."
Ruffles are dangerous because they are small and dense and usually move at high speed and close to the players.
Dr. Liu and his team collected information from 52 men and 33 women, who had been injured in the eyes during a badminton match in the six years between 2011 and 2017.
The study participants were between the ages of 15 and 65 and had been playing badminton for seven years on average. None was professional.
In five cases in total, the injury was penetrating, which is considered a "trauma" that could result in permanent vision loss.
In one case, the victim became blind to the wounded eye, according to the newspaper published online by the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Dr. Liu said, "The assessment of the type of injury showed that 58 were hyphaemias, where blood accumulates in the anterior chamber of the eye, and 36 of them switched to secondary glaucoma.
"In 23 cases, the lens was partially dislocated and the injury resulted in retinal detachment in two other cases; 26 people had to be operated on for their injuries.
The player had been hit by a steering wheel in 60 of the cases, while one racket had caused the injury in the other 25.
Flying caused most injuries, but researchers found that snowshoe injuries were more serious.
They had produced enough strength to overthrow the player, break his glasses or even break the eyeball.
Most of the injuries occurred in doubles (73 cases) and only 10 in singles matches.
In more than half of the cases (52), the partner of the double was injured, the other player having turned to him by striking a blow; in 31 cases, an opponent was responsible.
And in countries where it is widely practiced, such as China, researchers worry that badminton causes a "substantial" proportion of sports-related eye injuries.
For example, badminton is popular in Southeast Asia and is therefore the leading cause of sports-related eye injuries.
In Malaysia, where badminton has been practiced for many years, sport accounts for two-thirds of eye injuries.
But there is no known guideline that makes eye protection a necessity.
Only the Ontario Badminton Association imposed goggles on all junior players and recommended eye protection for all badminton players in 2005.
Half of the injured study participants did not know that badminton could be considered a "high-risk" sport because of its association with an eye injury.
The results prompted researchers to make several recommendations, including advising people not to play badminton who already have an impaired vision, one eye that is functioning, who is recovering from surgery, or who has already had surgery or surgery. eye disease.
Lee Clapham, a former England badminton player and a qualified Badminton Association of England coach, told MailOnline that imposing rules were not needed, especially among professionals.
He said: "Some people were injured in the eyes, most by a steering wheel.
"It's usually club players, amateur or junior, who are not as competent in the field. It would be a coincidence if it happened at the highest level.
Although some people have already tried to lobby for recommendations – especially parents – Mr Clapham said it was not justified.
He said: "Unfortunately, there are not enough injuries to justify it, especially in the professional sector.
"The percentage is so small that restrictions might only be needed at the beginner level."
[ad_2]
Source link